So, our results came back with FTDNA, and most of it made sense based on our known genealogy. Even the Native American ancestry did show in the results, supposedly. What I am wondering is how to interpret this. Since the 1600s all of our family came from the east coast of the United States. There are no known ancestors from East Asia, Southeast Asia, or Australia - its extremely unlikely in the past 500 years.
Did anyone else with known Native American ancestry receive Oceania in their results?
Is trace results of Native American North American, Central Asia, and Oceania a strong indicator of a distant Native ancestor, or are they referring to different ancestors?
Did anyone else with known Native American ancestry receive Oceania in their results?
Is trace results of Native American North American, Central Asia, and Oceania a strong indicator of a distant Native ancestor, or are they referring to different ancestors?
Comment