long long time since i post.
i have old dna print that shows 98% european 2% east asian
i think east asian is actually native american as one ancestor is supposed to be cherokee and the correct timeframe would be 1800. that is my great great grandmother's grandparent should be 100% indian then, making her a quarter and me a thirty-second or roughly 2-3% mongoloid as the dna print showed.
if that is not true my mother's mtdna is h and for some reason match more finns in the mtdna.org db than probable and that's where the 2% east asian could be coming from.
will population finder clear this ambiguity up or not?
finally in 1997 a guy sent me a email when i just started genealogy and told me out of nowhere that the grogans first came to roscommon co ireland from norway around a thousand years ago via longford. dumb me didn't ask for sources. so i looked at a map of norway and guessed if true the fjord above stavanger looks reasonable around tau. i also did some searching for grogans in roscommon and found the family was first known as a caretaker of church property about 900 years ago and those grounds where near the end of longford.
well i knew i'm not going to find a paper trail tothat so i forgot about it. few years later ftdna comes along after i've finished my reseach and i go what the heck i'll prove that indian story with that. that i have irish ancestry is obvious. well the test kind of proved that and i forget about it until this m222+ and ui naill clan by ftdna comes up. so great i go i'll to that as a paper trail don't exist but if i match it makes that story of the grogans being originally church caretakers in roscommon co much more likely. so i do match and that's good enough for me that's it again for a couple of years.
hearing about the new pop finder thing i come back and now there is an snp or is it stp map for m222+ and the my sursprise is one loci about 25 kilometers north or tau, norway. so i'm like maybe that guy kevin in 1997 was right.
but ultimately i could not find proof; not that i search more than 3 times 10 years ago.
anyway my question regarding kevin's story is it possible to know if that m222+ loci near tau, norway precedes the huge number of m222+ in the british isles or follows it?
anyway for my gedcom the paper trail has mostly run out though i got much further back on more branches than i thought i would (particularly if the branch were english). i now trying to 'close' out the 'unprovable 2 claims' with ftdna.
anyway it's been interesting to see how some inpropable stories i was told 15 years ago are being heavily implied if not proved by some improbable dna test results. of course if it's true than it's not improbable.
thanks vey much
best regards
i have old dna print that shows 98% european 2% east asian
i think east asian is actually native american as one ancestor is supposed to be cherokee and the correct timeframe would be 1800. that is my great great grandmother's grandparent should be 100% indian then, making her a quarter and me a thirty-second or roughly 2-3% mongoloid as the dna print showed.
if that is not true my mother's mtdna is h and for some reason match more finns in the mtdna.org db than probable and that's where the 2% east asian could be coming from.
will population finder clear this ambiguity up or not?
finally in 1997 a guy sent me a email when i just started genealogy and told me out of nowhere that the grogans first came to roscommon co ireland from norway around a thousand years ago via longford. dumb me didn't ask for sources. so i looked at a map of norway and guessed if true the fjord above stavanger looks reasonable around tau. i also did some searching for grogans in roscommon and found the family was first known as a caretaker of church property about 900 years ago and those grounds where near the end of longford.
well i knew i'm not going to find a paper trail tothat so i forgot about it. few years later ftdna comes along after i've finished my reseach and i go what the heck i'll prove that indian story with that. that i have irish ancestry is obvious. well the test kind of proved that and i forget about it until this m222+ and ui naill clan by ftdna comes up. so great i go i'll to that as a paper trail don't exist but if i match it makes that story of the grogans being originally church caretakers in roscommon co much more likely. so i do match and that's good enough for me that's it again for a couple of years.
hearing about the new pop finder thing i come back and now there is an snp or is it stp map for m222+ and the my sursprise is one loci about 25 kilometers north or tau, norway. so i'm like maybe that guy kevin in 1997 was right.
but ultimately i could not find proof; not that i search more than 3 times 10 years ago.
anyway my question regarding kevin's story is it possible to know if that m222+ loci near tau, norway precedes the huge number of m222+ in the british isles or follows it?
anyway for my gedcom the paper trail has mostly run out though i got much further back on more branches than i thought i would (particularly if the branch were english). i now trying to 'close' out the 'unprovable 2 claims' with ftdna.
anyway it's been interesting to see how some inpropable stories i was told 15 years ago are being heavily implied if not proved by some improbable dna test results. of course if it's true than it's not improbable.
thanks vey much
best regards
Comment