We are testing three distant cousins with 67 markers and below is what we have gotten so far. My question is, based on these results, what should we do now to see if we really do come from the same immigrant ancestor/family in Switzerland? We want the percentages to be higher than 84% and 89% which is all we have now. The surnames all match, and it is a distinct surname which is not common.
Do we go clading, snping or go to 111 markers? I am trying to do this logically, efficiently and economically. I (think I) am less interested in Family Finder because I am using DNA from a cousin in my line and not someone from my exact family.
37 Marker - Genetic Distance - 2
67 Marker - Genetic Distance - 3
67 markers purchased on all three individuals, but waiting on individual 1. The chart below should tell the columns where we differ.
DYS460 CDY DYS534 we think the paper trail shows
1. 11 38-39 waiting for test common ancestor 6 gen.
2. 12 37-39 15 common ancestor 6 gen.
3. 13 38-39 16 common ancestor 7 gen.
Another cousin has given me his subclade from a NatGeo test several years old:
Haplogroup R1b, M343 (Subclade R1b1a2, M269)
Thanks!
Lime
Do we go clading, snping or go to 111 markers? I am trying to do this logically, efficiently and economically. I (think I) am less interested in Family Finder because I am using DNA from a cousin in my line and not someone from my exact family.
37 Marker - Genetic Distance - 2
67 Marker - Genetic Distance - 3
67 markers purchased on all three individuals, but waiting on individual 1. The chart below should tell the columns where we differ.
DYS460 CDY DYS534 we think the paper trail shows
1. 11 38-39 waiting for test common ancestor 6 gen.
2. 12 37-39 15 common ancestor 6 gen.
3. 13 38-39 16 common ancestor 7 gen.
Another cousin has given me his subclade from a NatGeo test several years old:
Haplogroup R1b, M343 (Subclade R1b1a2, M269)
Thanks!
Lime
Comment