Dear fellow GAPs:
Bennett and I spoke for over an hour about my groups recent 37 results(he confirmed the results)....Thank you Bennett!
Can I ask other GAPs for their thoughts....
We had two samples from:
1. thoroughly studied Maxwell men (all records exhausted) and no known link back 7 generations...
2.each born ca 1730
3.each migrated to Chester Co, Pa ca 1760
4. each with simliar names (one named Henry with son Thomas , and the other named Thomas with son named Henry)...all Maxwell surnames...
5. each with similar migration patterns (Chester Co, Pa 1760> Cumbrland Co, Pa 1790>westPa 1800, Wva> Ohio 1820>Indiana 1835 > Mo>Ia 1855)
#############
These 2 samples matched 24/25 (exception is 437, one is 16 and one is 15)
When we received our 37 markers we were NONMATCHES at 30/37 (sometimes stated as 32/37 with 2- 2 step changes at 576 and CDY-b).....but still a NONMATCH.....
Differences were:
GATAH4 12, 11
576 19,18
570 15,17
CDYb 42,40
plus the 16, 15 at 437 [24/25]
These findings will be very rare and statistically significant?
Unfortunately I am one of the sample donors.....
Are the new panel of markers "so fast moving" that I shouldnt correlate them to a standard mutation rate (0.002-0.004)?
Could a few of you give me your thoughts.....
Help!
Thanks
Don Maxwell
MAXWELL surname GAP
[B]
Bennett and I spoke for over an hour about my groups recent 37 results(he confirmed the results)....Thank you Bennett!
Can I ask other GAPs for their thoughts....
We had two samples from:
1. thoroughly studied Maxwell men (all records exhausted) and no known link back 7 generations...
2.each born ca 1730
3.each migrated to Chester Co, Pa ca 1760
4. each with simliar names (one named Henry with son Thomas , and the other named Thomas with son named Henry)...all Maxwell surnames...
5. each with similar migration patterns (Chester Co, Pa 1760> Cumbrland Co, Pa 1790>westPa 1800, Wva> Ohio 1820>Indiana 1835 > Mo>Ia 1855)
#############
These 2 samples matched 24/25 (exception is 437, one is 16 and one is 15)
When we received our 37 markers we were NONMATCHES at 30/37 (sometimes stated as 32/37 with 2- 2 step changes at 576 and CDY-b).....but still a NONMATCH.....
Differences were:
GATAH4 12, 11
576 19,18
570 15,17
CDYb 42,40
plus the 16, 15 at 437 [24/25]
These findings will be very rare and statistically significant?
Unfortunately I am one of the sample donors.....
Are the new panel of markers "so fast moving" that I shouldnt correlate them to a standard mutation rate (0.002-0.004)?
Could a few of you give me your thoughts.....
Help!
Thanks
Don Maxwell
MAXWELL surname GAP
[B]
Comment