Hold the Phone

[Marttinen]

Thanks for information

Ah, I see. My 389-1 was, in fact, 14. Mystery solved. I shall sleep well tonight. Thanks.

[sterlingnotes]

it's just recorded a different way

It's not a mistake, it's just recorded a different way.
Check out the value of your 389-1 marker... I bet it's 14.
If you add the 389-1 marker value to the 389-2 marker value that the genographic project gave you... (14 + 17) you get what FTDNA reported as the value for 389-2 (31)
I know it's a little confusing, but that's why you see a difference between the two.

[Marttinen]

I took a closer look at the SRT's in the DNA analysis in my Genographic results and found that the 389-2 was recorded as 17. In the Family Tree and E3b pages it is 31. All of the other participants had that value around 30 also. Is it typical for such a number to be a mistake?