I was watching the national geographic cd on the origins of mankind but there is part I fail to grasp genetically.
Here I speaking of the first wave of people out of Africa. To simplify my question let's use A for African, B for Australian bushman and SI for southern India.He makes the claim that A is first,B is second and SI is a missing link (genetically)
Does he believe this because he finds A markers followed by B markers followed by SI markers in some of the markers he looked at in SI?
To extend the question do we all have A markers followed by other markers depending on what wave or what route we took out of africa? Or is it more complex than that?
Here I speaking of the first wave of people out of Africa. To simplify my question let's use A for African, B for Australian bushman and SI for southern India.He makes the claim that A is first,B is second and SI is a missing link (genetically)
Does he believe this because he finds A markers followed by B markers followed by SI markers in some of the markers he looked at in SI?
To extend the question do we all have A markers followed by other markers depending on what wave or what route we took out of africa? Or is it more complex than that?
Comment