I realize physical genetic traits and standard dna testing aren't considered linked, but I'm hoping someone can enlighten me about physical dna traits. I know, I've sort of asked this before. still trying to understand it, and musing over how it and dna testing, merged together, might work better as a "team" than seperately.
looking for another note in my genealogy program, I stumbled across an old email from my eldest sibling. in it she states that our maternal grandmother, whom I suspect has a bit more than a drop or two of Romany in her, had odd eyes, one brown and one blue. they were clear, and my sister claims they photo'd as though they were the same color-maybe in black and white, I'm not so sure about color photos. I suspect she got them from her maternal side as they were also light colored eyed. that's the branch that is suspected to have Romany in it. such a pity that we can't find a living male descendant!
any comments are of interest, though I'm curious to know the present scientific take on odd-eyed individuals.
my husband has his own familial dna traits which I've mentioned previously in other notes, a 3rd tear duct which a brother and a son have. there are, of course other traits that show up in specific families. I'm of the strong oppinion that familial traits such as these must run parallel with the standard dna testing, in that physical traits pretty much remain within the family unit, so if we were to, say, find an unknown Moore who hasn't been tested who had a third tearduct chances are extremely good that they would dna test almost identical to if not exactly identical to my husband and his brothers and sons. this could also be the case for disease, although some is culturally caused within the family unit, and so is not an actual genetic trait. it depends on the family. we've had female reproductive cancer on both sides of our family, but it has not shown up in the generations since my eldest sibling's birth on my mother's side, and for 3 more generations back on my father's side.
looking for another note in my genealogy program, I stumbled across an old email from my eldest sibling. in it she states that our maternal grandmother, whom I suspect has a bit more than a drop or two of Romany in her, had odd eyes, one brown and one blue. they were clear, and my sister claims they photo'd as though they were the same color-maybe in black and white, I'm not so sure about color photos. I suspect she got them from her maternal side as they were also light colored eyed. that's the branch that is suspected to have Romany in it. such a pity that we can't find a living male descendant!
any comments are of interest, though I'm curious to know the present scientific take on odd-eyed individuals.
my husband has his own familial dna traits which I've mentioned previously in other notes, a 3rd tear duct which a brother and a son have. there are, of course other traits that show up in specific families. I'm of the strong oppinion that familial traits such as these must run parallel with the standard dna testing, in that physical traits pretty much remain within the family unit, so if we were to, say, find an unknown Moore who hasn't been tested who had a third tearduct chances are extremely good that they would dna test almost identical to if not exactly identical to my husband and his brothers and sons. this could also be the case for disease, although some is culturally caused within the family unit, and so is not an actual genetic trait. it depends on the family. we've had female reproductive cancer on both sides of our family, but it has not shown up in the generations since my eldest sibling's birth on my mother's side, and for 3 more generations back on my father's side.
Comment