Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Tribes' Populations

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DeeTyler
    replied
    I apologize for "eavesdropping" but I am finding this conversation totally fascinating, and you have got me tempted to check into DNA Tribes as well. My family's Y and mt DNA tests don't have any matches yet and I'm wondering if it might give me some additional clues about what areas we might tie into. At this point I'll take any clues I can get!

    I'm assuming that this is a test that can also be taken by a female? And, judging by the reports you get, would it help me narrow in on general regions in the British Isles?

    It looks VERY cool!

    Leave a comment:


  • rainbow
    replied
    New estimate is approximately 1/8, with 1/8 to 1/4 not excluded.

    Leave a comment:


  • rainbow
    replied
    Thanks


    I have no matches in my newest Native American panel. The top three are:
    Athabaskan (Alaska) (0.01) 0.01
    Hnu Hnu (Otomi) (Hidalgo, Mexico) (0) 0.00
    Chol Maya (Northeast Chiapas, Mexico) (0) 0.00


    Sometimes I get over 1.0 for Athabaskan (Alaska) in my updates, and sometimes I don't.

    I still have Latin American matches and Native American (mixed) matches, and a world region match to Mestizo.

    My world region matches are the same twelve as last time (above 1.0). Here are the new numbers:
    North African (0.36) 75.49
    Mediterranean (0.33) 47.40
    Northwest European (0.29) 42.71
    Aegean (0.37) 34.17
    Levantine (0.33) 33.65
    Mestizo (0.46) 28.41
    Mesopotamian (0.34) 24.92
    Finno-Ugrian (0.24) 17.59
    North India (0.33) 11.41
    Eastern European (0.18) 10.57
    Arabian (0.1) 6.51
    South India (0.06) 1.41

    In my Part B, I picked up Southern Morocco (Arabic speakers), and Turkey. Those two replaced Arab (Israel), and Extremadura, Spain. But not in the same spots, just within the top twenty.

    Leave a comment:


  • rainbow
    replied
    Originally posted by drouhin View Post
    Hi rainbow,

    The scores were quite a surprise! I'm presently waiting for my 23andme results to come in to see whether they confirm the Tribes results.

    I've since encountered a poster on another thread who's 1/2 NA and has a Global Tribes breakdown similar to mine. His highest Regions score is also Mestizo, only his is very slightly lower than mine.
    I wonder if you'll get a percentage of East Asian. 23andme lists American Indian as East Asian.
    But one poster who had 10% Native American from one test (DNA Print) got no East Asian at all with 23andme (or decodeme? one of those companies.)

    But with your high Mestizo score from DNA Tribes I would expect you would have at least 20% East Asian with 23andme. Let's wait and see.


    I managed to view my new pdfs from DNA Tribes. My latest update was emailed to me on May 21, but I couldn't view it until this afternoon.

    It's pretty much the same as my previous ones. Lots of Portugal. I picked up Southern Morocco in my top 20 this time (#3). And I have Turkey again, at #20. In my new Europa, I have Portuguese at #1, and Celtic at #2, and Spanish at #3 (Norse dropped to fourth and Spanish moved up to third).



    edit: Here is my new signature (I copied and pasted it to here, instead of retyping it all), with my latest top three matches from DNA Tribes.

    Elizabeth
    MTDNA: H1 16519C
    2006 AncestryByDna 2.5: 83% European & 17% Native American.
    Europa: Portuguese (0.34) 78.63, Celtic (0.29) 43.79, Spanish (0.28) 43.00
    Part B: Syria (0.58) 183.82, Morocco (0.4) 155.59, Southern Morocco (Arabic speakers) (0.24) 145.64

    Part C: Puerto Rican (Springfield, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) (0.53) 215.38, Sergipe, Brazil (0.42) 214.46, Syria (0.58) 183.82
    Part D: North African (0.38) 75.49, Mediterranean (0.33) 47.40, Northwest European (0.29) 42.71
    Last edited by rainbow; 23 May 2009, 03:36 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • drouhin
    replied
    Hi rainbow,

    The scores were quite a surprise! I'm presently waiting for my 23andme results to come in to see whether they confirm the Tribes results.

    I've since encountered a poster on another thread who's 1/2 NA and has a Global Tribes breakdown similar to mine. His highest Regions score is also Mestizo, only his is very slightly lower than mine.

    Leave a comment:


  • rainbow
    replied
    Originally posted by rainbow View Post
    Hi drouhin,

    I'm wondering what yor results were. Did you get them yet?

    You and I both have ancestry from New Jersey and I wondered if you have Mestizo or other Native American/Latin American matches (that is what I have).

    Elizabeth
    Oops, never mind. I just saw that you already posted them in another thread, and that we already talked about all that in that thread.
    I guess I'm getting forgetful.

    Leave a comment:


  • rainbow
    replied
    Originally posted by tomcat View Post
    Friday, May 15, 2009
    New Populations for May 15, 2009

    We are pleased to announce the addition of several new populations to our database:

    New East Asian Populations:
    Central Thailand (212)
    Indonesia (402)
    Northeastern Thailand (304)
    Northern Thailand (202)
    Philippines (181)
    Southern Thailand (211)

    New European Populations:
    Moldavia, Romania (1,321)
    Republic of Montenegro (101)

    New Latin American Populations:
    Mestizo (Bolivia) (148)

    New Near Eastern Populations:
    Palestinian (Gaza Strip) (125)
    Southern Morocco (Arabic speakers) (204)

    New South Asian Populations:
    Bengali (Bangladesh) (148)

    Thank you Tomcat

    I ordered the update analysis for the new algorithm and new populations. I may or may not get "Mestizo (Bolivia)", but chances are I will get "Palestinian (Gaza Strip)", since I match "Arab (Israel)" and "Syria" on my last update. They don't have a category for Lebanon yet (where the Phoenicians were from).
    Chances are my matches will change with the new algorithm (that word always makes me think of Al Gore).

    I think DNA Tribes pdfs/digests are interesting. They are like the autosomal version of the Genographic Project.

    Leave a comment:


  • rainbow
    replied
    Originally posted by drouhin View Post
    Does anyone know how quick the turnaround is for the 21 marker Tribes report, especially recently?

    I just sent in my sample, and it got to the lab around Wednesday, this week. Any hope for receiving the report by the end of next week?

    Can you tell I want to see the results?
    Hi drouhin,

    I'm wondering what yor results were. Did you get them yet?

    You and I both have ancestry from New Jersey and I wondered if you have Mestizo or other Native American/Latin American matches (that is what I have).

    Elizabeth

    Leave a comment:


  • tomcat
    replied
    Recent Tribes' Population.db Update

    Friday, May 15, 2009
    New Populations for May 15, 2009

    We are pleased to announce the addition of several new populations to our database:

    New East Asian Populations:
    Central Thailand (212)
    Indonesia (402)
    Northeastern Thailand (304)
    Northern Thailand (202)
    Philippines (181)
    Southern Thailand (211)

    New European Populations:
    Moldavia, Romania (1,321)
    Republic of Montenegro (101)

    New Latin American Populations:
    Mestizo (Bolivia) (148)

    New Near Eastern Populations:
    Palestinian (Gaza Strip) (125)
    Southern Morocco (Arabic speakers) (204)

    New South Asian Populations:
    Bengali (Bangladesh) (148)

    Leave a comment:


  • RegRiv
    replied
    My husband just received his a week or so ago. It took about 9 days total, (including the weekend days) from when they received it. It arrived in our email box on a Friday after 4 pm. Also, in the past, I've received report results late on a Saturday.

    Leave a comment:


  • V.R.R
    replied
    They are fast

    Originally posted by drouhin View Post
    Does anyone know how quick the turnaround is for the 21 marker Tribes report, especially recently?
    I just sent in my sample, and it got to the lab around Wednesday, this week. Any hope for receiving the report by the end of next week?
    Can you tell I want to see the results?
    Hello! Dna Tribes is fast. They took 07 days to send my (21 maker).

    Leave a comment:


  • drouhin
    replied
    Does anyone know how quick the turnaround is for the 21 marker Tribes report, especially recently?

    I just sent in my sample, and it got to the lab around Wednesday, this week. Any hope for receiving the report by the end of next week?

    Can you tell I want to see the results?

    Leave a comment:


  • RegRiv
    replied
    Thanks for sharing, Elizabeth. It's so interesting to see the new changes. So, Syria is still #1 on your part B. (That's my hubby's #1 hit, too.) I'll wait a bit longer before I do any updates on myself -even though I'm always curious where things sit. (Last time, Iceland pushed Brazil out of my top 3.)

    Leave a comment:


  • rainbow
    replied
    I just got my newest DNA Tribes update analysis.
    I already edited my signature to reflect it.
    I'll copy and paste it here.
    Elizabeth
    MTDNA: H1 16519C. From Colonial Virginia.
    2006 AncestryByDna 2.5: 83% European & 17% Native American.
    Europa: Portuguese (0.35) 78.35, Norse (0.32) 44.84, Celtic (0.25) 42.03
    Part B: Syria (0.60) 184.97, Morocco (0.38) 146.23, Portugal (0.35) 109.21

    Part C: Sergipe, Brazil (0.41) 217.78, Puerto Rican (Springfield, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) (0.53) 216.25, Syria (0.60) 184.97
    Part D: North African (0.32) 64.10, Mediterranean (0.31) 48.05, Northwest European (0.29) 39.13



    My Native American panel doesn't have any matches this time again. The top of the list is Athabaskan (Alaska) (0.01) 0.01. All the rest are 0.00.

    In the Europa, Celtic bumped out Spanish (finally!) for third place. I think my Celtic should be in first place. The majority of my ancestry is British Isles. Except for the unknown 17% Native American detected by DNA Print in the summer of 2006.


    Instead of picking up Qatar and Libya as I feared (a long time ago I matched Southern Tunisia) , my top 20 global picked up the new Brazilian category of Northern Rio, and the Central Portugal (and Azores). My top 20 global has 12 Brazil, 1 Puerto Rican, 1 Azores, 1 Caucasian, 1 Northeast Spain, 2 Portugal, 1 Morocco, and 1 Syria.

    Sergipe, Brazil is now my top global match. I pronounce it "Sir Gippy" lol. I don't know if that is right.

    The world regions are the same twelve as last time, with the same top three in the same order. Fourth is Aegean. Fifth is Levantine. Mestizo is sixth of the twelve and is at (0.45) 28.41.


    My new Part B is:
    Syria
    Morocco
    Portugal
    Central Portugal
    Northeast Spain
    Flemish
    Central Portugal (again)
    Switzerland
    Portugal (again)
    Andalusia, Spain
    Flemish (Belgium)
    France
    Flemish
    Croatia
    Bosnian Mountain Villages
    Extremadura, Spain
    Denmark
    Sicily, Italy
    Arab (Israel)
    Piemonte, Italy


    It's pretty much the same as my last one, except the matches to Turkey dropped out of the top 20. I think I picked up more Portugal. Did I have that Croatia before? I know I had the Bosnian Mountain Villages.
    Last edited by rainbow; 16 April 2009, 06:24 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • rainbow
    replied
    Originally posted by PDHOTLEN View Post
    Weren't there Indians already in Puerto Rico when the Spaniards arrived?
    Yes there were already Caribbean Indians (Taino and Arawak) when the Spanish got there. And many were sent to Europe. But many Woodland/East Coast Indians were shipped out as slaves and sent to the West Indies and to Europe (I wonder where in Europe. Just NW Europe?). I think the people that moved to Massachusetts may be descended from the original New England Indians that were sent to the Caribbean/West Indies in the 1600s. They could be mixed with Taino as well as English, Spanish, Dutch etc.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X