New results in our Dewhu/irst DNA Group [http://homepages.rootsweb.ancestry.c...whurstDNA.htm] *could* lead to a major breakthrough in connecting several well researched lines ... unfortunately, we have a discrepancy in 385a DYS. All the other results show that marker as 14, and these results bring it in as 11. I read what I could find to learn that this marker discrepancy is not uncommon and may be connected to alcoholism ... but that if the rest of the markers match the chances the lines are closely related is high, and the rest of the markers do match.
What do I tell the participants who are eager to know if this is a good clue for them? Is this result good enough to lead researchers to try to prove tie - ins to this line? It could take research back 200 years from 1700 to 1500 ....
Any suggestions/advice greatly appreciated!
Jana Black
What do I tell the participants who are eager to know if this is a good clue for them? Is this result good enough to lead researchers to try to prove tie - ins to this line? It could take research back 200 years from 1700 to 1500 ....
Any suggestions/advice greatly appreciated!
Jana Black
Comment