If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I have 460 = 10 and 390 = 23 and 492 =13. I took the FTDNA deep clade test, and ended up "R1b1c?" with a bunch of negatives. I can remember when all Y-DNA of human males were the same. So, I think we are just beginning to understand how to classify the Y-DNA. I hate this not knowing (Scotty TOS). Still, we must learn to wait some times.
Have you considered testing at Ethnoancestry for the S-series? It sounds like there's a good chance you are S21+.
Have you considered testing at Ethnoancestry for the S-series? It sounds like there's a good chance you are S21+.
Mike
Yep, I was hoping not to be at square one again with R1b1c9*. I thought the FTDNA deep clade SNP would be more complete. I have for sometime expected historical connections related to S21+. I wonder though what new test are being planned for 2007. And it came down to planning my Disney vacation in Dec. 2007 or getting the S-series test after my full mtDNA test or maybe both. I decided to wait and see what will happen in 2007.
some people might have just ran to the Hills. not everyone was a Gunning knight..
Dang!!! I wanted to be a knight in shining armour !! Anyway, I guess my surname heritage could be associated with the infamous war bow archer or knight killer of the Medieval Period. , or maybe desk jockey in the U.S. Navy
Comment