Can someone tell me why having a mutation at 16189 prevents bidirectional sequencing?
(I'm also curious if anyone has anything interesting to say about the claim that having 16189 mutation causes a back mutation at 16192- supposedly the first evidence that local context can lead to a change? )
(I'm also curious if anyone has anything interesting to say about the claim that having 16189 mutation causes a back mutation at 16192- supposedly the first evidence that local context can lead to a change? )
Comment