Originally posted by prairielad
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Afraid to test
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MMaddi View PostWhat made me cringe is that someone who tells us in the first sentence that he's a stem cell and reproductive biologist does not realize that DNA testing has the potential to reveal hidden family secrets. Also, anyone who's tested at 23andMe knows about the multiple hoops that they force people to jump through before you can participate in the DNA Relatives feature. (The author wrote, "23andMe's way of protecting people is by giving users the chance to click that box to opt into the relative finder program. I think they're trying to protect people from themselves... He [the father] logged into his account, and Thomas [the half brother] wasn't showing up at all. I was so confused. We figured out that at the very bottom of your profile, there's a little box that says 'check this box if you want to see close family members in this search program.' Dad checked it, and Thomas' name appeared in his list. 23andMe said dad was 50 percent related with Thomas and that he was a predicted son.") That's the feature that revealed that the father had a child before he married. But the author of this article, with fair warning from 23andMe about potentially revealing family secrets, opted into DNA Relatives on his father's behalf.
Maybe the biggest cringe factor in this article is that the author believes it's 23andMe's fault that his parents divorced. The author was not told by 23andMe to reach out to his half brother but did. Then he informed his father about this "close relative" and asked him to click on "show close relatives." His father wanted to meet his son, whom he conceived before he married, and his wife objected, enough to divorce him. It sounds like this marriage had troubles before 23andMe came into the picture.
The lesson here is that you should investigate all the pros and cons before you embark on DNA testing or anything that has the possibility of upsetting others. Maybe the author knows his way around a biology lab, but he's clueless when it comes to interpersonal relationships.
As a son and as a grown man, my overall objective would have been to protect family members. I would have had the maturity to talk to my father in privacy verses talking to my sister and others first.
This just proves you cannot fix stupid. I doubt a therapist can fix what is really wrong with this phd guy.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by K. L. Adams View PostI doubt a therapist can fix what is really wrong with this phd guy.
But this is the story written. The case of Auslander here is a different story, he wants his cousins to do the test without "telling them the real reason I want them to test", he even says "I may want to be anonymous myself" when doing so. In my opinion this is not okay, not only morally but even in a juridical sense. Especially in such sensitive fields one should play with all cards on the table.
Edit: Sure, the truth heals but you have to be truthful yourself, too.Last edited by PeBe; 14 June 2015, 09:02 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by PeBe View Post
....
But this is the story written. The case of Auslander here is a different story, he wants his cousins to do the test without "telling them the real reason I want them to test", he even says "I may want to be anonymous myself" when doing so.
IMO this is not okay, not only morally but even in a juridical sense. Especially in such sensitive fields one should play with all cards on the table.
I will also add, to my understanding, this deals with a NPE in OPs line not this 2nd cousin
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by prairielad View PostCareful not to put words in someone else mouth and misconstrue statement. There was a LOL behind that statement.
Comment
-
Comment