Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Surnames and Locations

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jim Denning
    replied
    and a answer to a deeper question

    where do I belong in this human puzzle lol

    one thing for sure i wont be a straight peice [au contraire]

    Leave a comment:


  • Jim Denning
    replied
    Originally posted by N12499
    I didn't mean to infer that the Surname Geneologist would be upset to find out about his less than noble background. The disappointment I see stems from all the insurmountable black holes as one attempts to trace his Surname deeper and deeper into history using DNA. I'm sure that many a known paternity was taken to the grave by the mother with no community or family knowledge, and with certainly no written record. As a Surname Geneologist, how can you proceed from there with DNA as a tool? I'm sorry for the confusion.

    i went into this with the idea my longford ireland people [stonemasons] came with lady forbes to ireland from scotland. which is where they fled to avoid persicution as roman catholics. i just wanted to prove this

    so i get my 12/12 back 48 and 24 of them are askenasi some with family ties to Israel. i was impressed everyone said pay no attention it means nothing.
    but when i started to get 25 matches and higher many had family stories of their people being forced to convert from judism. well it started to look like something.

    the name denning is one of the most variable names in english the dnnng run together vowel points drift. i have been dennehy dennis danning dennin dennen dennahy danahy dinnin dinan in my short life . people i worked with for 20 yrs still call me them.

    i can imagine a sephardic jew named dannanberg comming to england for the normans to collect taxes and administer the new land. maybe he stayed and eventually he converted or was forced to. a converted jew would not want berg so they dropped it. from there itis easy to get the rest.

    a story yeah now it is but i want to test some dannenbergs bigtime.
    as we sitrhere typing the total tested is 80,000 or so , when its 9,000,000 thats when it will be clearer . if i continue to get the same as i do know .when should i believe it

    i have seen the figures on no parental events as people call them,i dont buy them either, i buy what i see. thisis a 1000 peice puzzle and every week we get 12 peices in the mail. slowly we get clues someone is providing us.

    there are different lines in genealogy\
    ones we see on paper and follow

    the ones you dont see to infidelity or other things

    dna can prove one and disprove others or go another direction entirely

    as an e3b1 i dont really care whether i came 30,000 yrs ago or 400 yrs ago

    i enjoy the hunt and i'll be at the mailbox waiting for that envelope till i get all 1000 peices


    all i know is i got more then stonemasons in scotland

    Leave a comment:


  • N12499
    Guest replied
    The Story

    I didn't mean to infer that the Surname Geneologist would be upset to find out about his less than noble background. The disappointment I see stems from all the insurmountable black holes as one attempts to trace his Surname deeper and deeper into history using DNA. I'm sure that many a known paternity was taken to the grave by the mother with no community or family knowledge, and with certainly no written record. As a Surname Geneologist, how can you proceed from there with DNA as a tool? I'm sorry for the confusion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jim Denning
    replied
    Originally posted by N12499
    I have a sneaky suspicion that many Surname Geneologists are going to be disappointed in their attempts to complete distant pedigree sheets using DNA. Surname and Spermname are entirely different. I don't tend to believe that human beings were any more monogamous in the past than they are today. Without any modern forms of birth control, and no DNA tests available until very recently, biological paternity was often only a guess.

    So what?
    if today i found i wasnt my dads son. i would still be my dads son still a denning with the stuff i learnt from him. maybe i could find the real dad but it wouldnt kill me. what i want is the story. is there any genealogist who wouldnt record and bad thing in their family. that person isnt a genealogist but a fiction author

    Leave a comment:


  • N12499
    Guest replied
    Surname Geneology and DNA geneology.

    I have a sneaky suspicion that many Surname Geneologists are going to be disappointed in their attempts to complete distant pedigree sheets using DNA. Surname and Spermname are entirely different. I don't tend to believe that human beings were any more monogamous in the past than they are today. Without any modern forms of birth control, and no DNA tests available until very recently, biological paternity was often only a guess.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jim Denning
    replied
    Originally posted by Jim Denning
    Some of you know i run locational and surname projects all of whom are part of a bigger project the Migration of people from Longford cavan to chelsea revere winthrop ma., Parramatta/SydneyAU. & HannibalMO/QuincyIL.
    the results below come from the longford,farrell,sydney,Farrell,Duggan ,Chelsea Denning Cogan projects

    N9949 R1b 13 25 14 11 11 13 12 12 12 13 14 29
    N10119 R1b 13 25 14 11 11 13 12 12 13 13 14 29
    36875 R1b 13 25 14 11 11 13 12 12 12 13 14 29 17 9 10 11 11 24 15 17 30 15 16 16 17 11 11 19 23 17 16 17 17 38 39 12 12
    N2397 R1b 13 25 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 29

    N10126 R1b 13 24 14 10 11 14 12 12 13 13 13 30
    N8929 R1b 13 24 14 10 11 15 12 12 12 13 13 29
    N3297 R1b 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 14 13 30
    20515 R1b 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 14 13 30 17 9 10 11 11 25 15 18 29 15 15 17 17 11 11 19 23 17 15 20 17 39 39 11 12
    N4064 R1b 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 13 13 13 29
    27344 R1b 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 13 13 13 29 18 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 30 14 14 15 17 11 11 19 23 18 15 18 17 36 40 13 12
    N5553 R1b 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29
    N10035 R1b 13 24 14 11 11 13 12 12 12 13 14 29
    6921 R1b 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 13 13 13 29

    Surnames didnt always exist and in alot of places the same people live where their ancestors 1000 yrs ago lived before surnames why wouldnt the native surnames share the same ydna lines?

    i hope the lines post okay
    add this one
    R1b 13 25 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 30

    Leave a comment:


  • Jim Denning
    started a topic Surnames and Locations

    Surnames and Locations

    Some of you know i run locational and surname projects all of whom are part of a bigger project the Migration of people from Longford cavan to chelsea revere winthrop ma., Parramatta/SydneyAU. & HannibalMO/QuincyIL.
    the results below come from the longford,farrell,sydney,Farrell,Duggan ,Chelsea Denning Cogan projects

    N9949 R1b 13 25 14 11 11 13 12 12 12 13 14 29
    N10119 R1b 13 25 14 11 11 13 12 12 13 13 14 29
    36875 R1b 13 25 14 11 11 13 12 12 12 13 14 29 17 9 10 11 11 24 15 17 30 15 16 16 17 11 11 19 23 17 16 17 17 38 39 12 12
    N2397 R1b 13 25 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 29

    N10126 R1b 13 24 14 10 11 14 12 12 13 13 13 30
    N8929 R1b 13 24 14 10 11 15 12 12 12 13 13 29
    N3297 R1b 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 14 13 30
    20515 R1b 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 14 13 30 17 9 10 11 11 25 15 18 29 15 15 17 17 11 11 19 23 17 15 20 17 39 39 11 12
    N4064 R1b 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 13 13 13 29
    27344 R1b 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 13 13 13 29 18 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 30 14 14 15 17 11 11 19 23 18 15 18 17 36 40 13 12
    N5553 R1b 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29
    N10035 R1b 13 24 14 11 11 13 12 12 12 13 14 29
    6921 R1b 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 13 13 13 29

    Surnames didnt always exist and in alot of places the same people live where their ancestors 1000 yrs ago lived before surnames why wouldnt the native surnames share the same ydna lines?

    i hope the lines post okay
Working...
X