All;
A while ago, I was contacted by an Individual with the last name of Belanger, who said that FTDNA results indicated that we were closely related (second cousin) even though we did not have the same surname. However, that surname does show up in my mother's French Canadian/Ojibway line. Sure enough, I had him pegged as a third cousin, since we share the same great great grandfather on my mother's side.
Since he had given me access to his ftdna account to help with a Dr Mcdonald analysis, about a week or so ago I looked for his other matches, out of curiosity, and discovered that he also matched a number of the Chisholms. This was a great shock to me, since the Chisholms are extensively represented on my male cousin William Graham's paternal dna haplotype of I1d1. I downloaded his Y DNA matches, and compared them to William Graham's results, and they also match on a number of other families, but none so extensively as the Chisholms. BTW William does not match too many of the Grahams.
My research has so far brought me to the conclusion that these three families (Graham/Chisholm/Belanger) are related somewhere in Norman or Flemish Europe before the Norman Conquest of England. The Belanger line stayed in France/Normandy (and later migrated to Canada), while the de Graham/de Chesholm ancestors migrated to the UK with William I (and later migrated to the USA, Canada, AT and NZ).
There is anecdotal evidence that the Grahams and Chishoms are descended from noble lineage prior to the Conquest, possibly from Denmark, Normandy, or Belgium, but the jury is still out on that one. Although the Graham coat of arms is identical to the de Hesdin arms, there are competing theories about the origin of William de Graham, the first Graham recorded in the UK. See http://clan-graham-society.org/origins.html for more. There may be several unrelated branches of Grahams, and the 1Id1 line may represent the Norman/Flemish line.
What I do know is that the Flemish, Norman and Belgian nobility were very close and tended to marry and take care of each other. These lines pre-date Charlemagne, and it would be exciting to connect with them. If I am correct, those results will help with other families such as the Chisholms. However, I am proceeding with caution. Some of my early attempts at genealogy led to wild speculation, and I am trying to locate documented sources along with some dna conjecture.
The bottom line is that I am more closely related than I thought to an individual (maternal AND paternal), although deeply related on the paternal side. These deep relations may be an indication of the true origin of some ancient family lines.
A while ago, I was contacted by an Individual with the last name of Belanger, who said that FTDNA results indicated that we were closely related (second cousin) even though we did not have the same surname. However, that surname does show up in my mother's French Canadian/Ojibway line. Sure enough, I had him pegged as a third cousin, since we share the same great great grandfather on my mother's side.
Since he had given me access to his ftdna account to help with a Dr Mcdonald analysis, about a week or so ago I looked for his other matches, out of curiosity, and discovered that he also matched a number of the Chisholms. This was a great shock to me, since the Chisholms are extensively represented on my male cousin William Graham's paternal dna haplotype of I1d1. I downloaded his Y DNA matches, and compared them to William Graham's results, and they also match on a number of other families, but none so extensively as the Chisholms. BTW William does not match too many of the Grahams.
My research has so far brought me to the conclusion that these three families (Graham/Chisholm/Belanger) are related somewhere in Norman or Flemish Europe before the Norman Conquest of England. The Belanger line stayed in France/Normandy (and later migrated to Canada), while the de Graham/de Chesholm ancestors migrated to the UK with William I (and later migrated to the USA, Canada, AT and NZ).
There is anecdotal evidence that the Grahams and Chishoms are descended from noble lineage prior to the Conquest, possibly from Denmark, Normandy, or Belgium, but the jury is still out on that one. Although the Graham coat of arms is identical to the de Hesdin arms, there are competing theories about the origin of William de Graham, the first Graham recorded in the UK. See http://clan-graham-society.org/origins.html for more. There may be several unrelated branches of Grahams, and the 1Id1 line may represent the Norman/Flemish line.
What I do know is that the Flemish, Norman and Belgian nobility were very close and tended to marry and take care of each other. These lines pre-date Charlemagne, and it would be exciting to connect with them. If I am correct, those results will help with other families such as the Chisholms. However, I am proceeding with caution. Some of my early attempts at genealogy led to wild speculation, and I am trying to locate documented sources along with some dna conjecture.
The bottom line is that I am more closely related than I thought to an individual (maternal AND paternal), although deeply related on the paternal side. These deep relations may be an indication of the true origin of some ancient family lines.
Comment