Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Khoisan

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by GST View Post
    It is just amazing that that you can be so consistently wrong, regardless of the topic.
    I am not wrong about L11 originating in western Europe.

    The first humans could have originated outside Africa.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by 1798 View Post
      @N21163
      "Chimps and modern humans share a common ancestor."

      You are wrong, we don't.
      Based on what exactly?

      Originally posted by 1798 View Post
      I am not wrong about L11 originating in western Europe.
      No one mentioned anything about L11, nor its origins.

      This is yet another example of you deviating from your original post.

      Stick to your original topic.

      Originally posted by 1798 View Post
      The first humans could have originated outside Africa.
      Not at all likely given the evidence and research that we currently have.

      Do you have any new material that actually supports such an idea?

      I would say no.

      Try reading the posts and articles that have been posted to you in this thread, I posted a link to the article you mentioned.

      Read through the discussion and conclusion section.
      N21163
      FTDNA Customer
      Last edited by N21163; 18 August 2015, 03:25 AM.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by GST View Post
        It is just amazing that that you can be so consistently wrong, regardless of the topic.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by N21163 View Post
          Based on what exactly?
          Human replication is 99.9% accurate today. In the beginning the accuracy was greater than 99.9%.


          Not at all likely given the evidence and research that we currently have.
          What evidence have the scientists got from 500,000 years ago?

          Comment


          • #20
            Either quote my posts in clear sections or do not quote me at all.

            I do not recall stating "Human replication is 99.9% accurate today. In the beginning the accuracy was greater than 99.9%."

            So why did you include it when you were quoting my previous post? I know it is easy for you to cut and paste without reading things thoroughly but this is where misquotes and misunderstandings occur.

            Originally posted by 1798 View Post
            What evidence have the scientists got from 500,000 years ago?
            Why did you pick 500,000 years ago? Are you referring to divergence in different human subspecies? or something else?

            Humans and chimps share a common ancestor millions of years ago, not 500,000 years ago.

            Evolutionary biology is a subject that uses findings from a number of scientific disciplines including paleontology, archaeology, primatology, evolutionary psychology, physical anthropology, ethology, embryology and more recently genetics (to name a few).

            If you don't understand how this has occurred read some more books, watch youtube videos, attend a university lecture or two on the subject.

            If you choose not to accept this scientific view, because it doesn't fit with some belief that you have or otherwise, then that is your problem entirely.

            Comment


            • #21
              [QUOTE=N21163;416347]Based on what exactly?
              [QUOTE]

              This is my view. Human replication is 99.9% accurate today. In the beginning the accuracy was greater than 99.9%.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by N21163 View Post



                Why did you pick 500,000 years ago? Are you referring to divergence in different human subspecies? or something else?

                Humans and chimps share a common ancestor millions of years ago, not 500,000 years ago.

                Evolutionary biology is a subject that uses findings from a number of scientific disciplines including paleontology, archaeology, primatology, evolutionary psychology, physical anthropology, ethology, embryology and more recently genetics (to name a few).

                If you don't understand how this has occurred read some more books, watch youtube videos, attend a university lecture or two on the subject.
                Some scientists think that if they add millions of years to our origin that makes it right.

                Comment


                • #23
                  [QUOTE=1798;416375][QUOTE=N21163;416347]Based on what exactly?

                  This is my view. Human replication is 99.9% accurate today. In the beginning the accuracy was greater than 99.9%.
                  I'll rephrase...this "opinion" is based on what exactly?

                  Any evidence? Any research?

                  Originally posted by 1798 View Post
                  Some scientists think that if they add millions of years to our origin that makes it right.
                  It's becoming all the more clear that you do not understand processes involved scientific disciplines.

                  It would be an idea for you to sit in on evolutionary biology classes and read some books on the subject

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    [QUOTE=N21163;416396][QUOTE=1798;416375]
                    Originally posted by N21163 View Post
                    Based on what exactly?


                    I'll rephrase...this "opinion" is based on what exactly?

                    Any evidence? Any research?



                    It's becoming all the more clear that you do not understand processes involved scientific disciplines.

                    It would be an idea for you to sit in on evolutionary biology classes and read some books on the subject
                    The difference between you and me is that I believe in God and I am thankful for that much.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      [QUOTE=1798;416407][QUOTE=N21163;416396]
                      Originally posted by 1798 View Post

                      The difference between you and me is that I believe in God and I am thankful for that much.
                      Now you are an expert on my faith?

                      You know nothing of my beliefs or what I am thankful for, so stop pretending like you do.

                      Once again you are deviate off topic.

                      If your faith prevents you from understanding, or wanting to understand, processes involved in scientific disciplines then that's your problem.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X