Originally posted by N21163
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ireland Before St. Patrick - Natl Geo
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by 1798 View PostThat is a big change from a few years back. Some posters think that the Celts all belong to a single subclade.
I never said the Celts belonged to a single subclade, in fact i dont recall any who did actually state such a thing.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by N21163 View PostYou're still thinking the same thing from a few years ago?
I never said the Celts belonged to a single subclade, in fact i dont recall any who did actually state such a thing.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MMaddi View PostYou're right. None of the regular posters in genetic genealogy forums make such a claim. That's just his straw man argument to make those he disagrees with sound unreasonable.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by 1798 View PostAre you stating that no poster ever referred to P312 as the Celtic subhaplogroup?
If someone believes that every single Celt man is P312, which is patently false, I think they would write that. The statement merely means that P312 is the predominant subclade found among modern Celtic populations, which is certainly true.
Either you're being too literal in interpreting what others write or you're deliberately misrepresenting what others write (straw man argument) to suit your argument. Now that you've been set straight about the meaning of "Celtic haplogroup," I trust you won't claim that some people believe it's the only haplogroup found among Celtic men. Right?Last edited by MMaddi; 20 March 2015, 12:14 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MMaddi View PostPerhaps. But that doesn't mean that P312 is the only haplogroup found among Celts!
If someone believes that every single Celt man is P312, which is patently false, I think they would write that. The statement merely means that P312 is the predominant subclade found among modern Celtic populations, which is certainly true.
Either you're being too literal in interpreting what others write or you're deliberately misrepresenting what others write (straw man argument) to suit your argument. Now that you've been set straight about the meaning of "Celtic haplogroup," I trust you won't claim that some people believe it's the only haplogroup found among Celtic men. Right?
When I wrote a post about R1b being linked to the Neolithic in western Europe some people got very upset. Why?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by 1798 View PostWhat argument are you referring to?
When I wrote a post about R1b being linked to the Neolithic in western Europe some people got very upset. Why?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MMaddi View PostNo reply necessary on my part. Your antics are well known here and on other genetic genealogy forums (where you're no longer allowed to post). Very few people take you seriously, but then I'm sure you've noticed that.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by 1798 View PostWho takes you seriously? What about the 7000 year old R1b in Spain? He is the first but he won't be the last.
Who can take someone seriously who insists that a man's yDNA haplogroup is determined by the mother, as you did in that post!
Comment
-
Comment