FTDNA recently updated their "MyOrigins" Results, and the results confuse me. I have 3 family members who've tested, a father, mother, and child. The results don't seem to add up. Before anyone suggests it, the DNA results do confirm the paternal relationship.
Below are the new results. In parenthesis is their ethnicity.
The Father (Sicilian)
Southeast Europe-85%
British Isles-8%
Ashkenazi-3%
East Middle East-<2%
Southeast Asia-<2%
Oceania-<2%
East Europe-<2%
The Mother (1/2 Hungarian, 1/2 Slavic)
East Europe-61%
Southeast Europe-37%
Asia Minor-<2%
The Daughter
Southeast Europe-42%
East Europe-41%
Asia Minor-16%
Ashkenazi-<2%
Siberia-<2%
This doesn't seem to make sense to me. Where did the Daughter's 16% Asia Minor come in, her parent's middle east DNA is only trace results? And how come neither of her parents have the Siberia DNA result? I suppose the daughter didn't inherit the father's 8% British Isles by pure chance alone. And just how does a Sicilian get Oceania DNA?
Also, is there a historical reason why Hungarian or Slavic has such a huge chunk of Southeast Europe in the DNA?

Below are the new results. In parenthesis is their ethnicity.
The Father (Sicilian)
Southeast Europe-85%
British Isles-8%
Ashkenazi-3%
East Middle East-<2%
Southeast Asia-<2%
Oceania-<2%
East Europe-<2%
The Mother (1/2 Hungarian, 1/2 Slavic)
East Europe-61%
Southeast Europe-37%
Asia Minor-<2%
The Daughter
Southeast Europe-42%
East Europe-41%
Asia Minor-16%
Ashkenazi-<2%
Siberia-<2%

Also, is there a historical reason why Hungarian or Slavic has such a huge chunk of Southeast Europe in the DNA?
Comment