Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Batch 336

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Mr. Mcd View Post
    I-l69(l69) 01/10/2010

    Results posted today 12/4/2009

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Mr. Mcd View Post
      Results posted today 12/4/2009
      Which results? Where?

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Darcy View Post
        Which results? Where?
        My Results FOR l69, L69-

        I think this is the fastest result I Have received yet.
        Last edited by Mr. Mcd; 5 December 2009, 02:00 PM.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Mr. Mcd View Post
          My Results FOR l69, L69-

          I think this is the fastest result I Have received yet.
          Oic ydna! Great!

          Comment


          • #20
            I am about to rip my hair out.

            mtDNAPlus(HVR1) 01/19/2010 336
            mtDNAPlus(HVR2) 01/19/2010 336

            This is what I jnow have for pending results. by which I am assuming my results that were due on January 5th have come in. Ehen I go to my ftdna home I have more things to look at:

            mtDNA
            Matches

            Ancestral Origins

            Haplogroup Origins

            Results

            These are all new, but when I click them all they say are I have no close matches at this time. But I cant find the results for the mtdna haplo test that was due January 5th.

            I think I shall cry.

            Comment


            • #21
              If you read through posts for earlier batches than yours, you'll see that many of us have tests with batch dates that are pushed back, and lots of us are waiting.

              Your results will come as they work their way through the backlog.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by gtc View Post
                If you read through posts for earlier batches than yours, you'll see that many of us have tests with batch dates that are pushed back, and lots of us are waiting.

                Your results will come as they work their way through the backlog.
                NO no it's not that.
                It looks like part of my results have posted and I just can't fiind the darn things. Maybe thay just took off the part of my testing that was due Jan 5th and haven't updated my results yet.

                Maybe I'm looking in the wrong places. I will CAREFULLY look thru all the new stuff on my page. I'm confused 'cause I have several new links.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Okay, I looked back through the thread.

                  Are you saying that this entry ...

                  mtDNAPlus(mtHaplo) 01/05/2010 336

                  ... is no longer on your Pending Lab Results page?

                  If so, have you looked at your mtDNA Haplogroup Origins page?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by gtc View Post
                    Okay, I looked back through the thread.

                    Are you saying that this entry ...

                    mtDNAPlus(mtHaplo) 01/05/2010 336

                    ... is no longer on your Pending Lab Results page?

                    If so, have you looked at your mtDNA Haplogroup Origins page?
                    Yes indeed that's exactly what I meant. Also thank you for telling me where to look. I'm afraid I got panic stricken by all the changes on my ftdna home page.

                    I am haplo group J. Just plain J no subclades as far as I can tell. Everything posted today -

                    HVR1 = 16069T

                    HVR2 = 073G , 185A, 228A, 263G, 295T, 315.1C, 462T, 489C.

                    Not at all what I was expecting which makes it kinda fun. I was sure I would be in either U or H since most of European Mtdna seems to be in those two. The hard part now is I have zero matches. I have a couple with matches on HVR1 and a few on HVR2 but nothing on both. Which will keep me busy digging for a while . Also I don't understand how I have just J mtdna without having a subclade. I don't remember seeing that before - I thought everybody has subclades but apparently that's not true.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X