Due date: 08/06/2007
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Batch 210 Created
Collapse
X
-
I should be getting some autosomal markers back with this Batch. It's been a long time since I had FTDNA do any PCR amplification-DNA identification for me. I'd be interested to hear impressions from any readers about FTDNA's processing times, adherence to quoted deadlines, etc.
J.
-------------------------------------------
Y=R1b
mt=H5a
Tribes world region matches=Mestizo 4.3, Asia Minor 3.61, Mongolian 2.73, Mediterranean 2.37, NE 1.78, EE 1.18
Comment
-
Originally posted by jahI should be getting some autosomal markers back with this Batch. It's been a long time since I had FTDNA do any PCR amplification-DNA identification for me. I'd be interested to hear impressions from any readers about FTDNA's processing times, adherence to quoted deadlines, etc.
J.
-------------------------------------------
Y=R1b
mt=H5a
Tribes world region matches=Mestizo 4.3, Asia Minor 3.61, Mongolian 2.73, Mediterranean 2.37, NE 1.78, EE 1.18
Comment
-
I just got high-res mtDNA results back two days ago from batch 207 about 3-4 weeks before the projected date. I was so impressed (having previously used Oxford Ancestors - enough said) that I emailed FTDNA and told them how happy I was with the service. I got a few very appreciative emails back, including one from Bennett Greenspan.
Comment
-
rivergirl and mickm,
Thanks for the replies. Quick processing times combined with no-cost, long-term DNA storage availability really provide value-added DNA testing. It's interesting to see how the number of testing companies is growing and how that affects the industry.
J.
-----------------------------------
Y=R1b
mt=H5a
Tribes world region matches=Mestizo 4.3, Asia Minor 3.61, Mongolian 2.73,
Mediterranean 2.37, NE 1.78, EE 1.18
Comment
-
Hi Dan,
I spoke with FTDNA via email last week about my dad's DYF371x results that were part of batch 210. Was told that there was a delay in getting the sample from the Univ. of Arizona due to the UA facility moving, but that the sample was now in Houston and testing would begin this week. I was also told that advanced tests have their own timetable depending on the test being done. Maybe my dad's case is similar to yours. I don't have a new due date.
Cathy
Comment
-
Originally posted by CathyHi Dan,
I spoke with FTDNA via email last week about my dad's DYF371x results that were part of batch 210. Was told that there was a delay in getting the sample from the Univ. of Arizona due to the UA facility moving, but that the sample was now in Houston and testing would begin this week. I was also told that advanced tests have their own timetable depending on the test being done. Maybe my dad's case is similar to yours. I don't have a new due date.
Cathy
Comment
-
Originally posted by GreymudAny word as to when they will be releasing (or completing) this batch (210)? I have not had a delay in my results this long before.
I can only assume that FTDNA was unable to get results from the project member's first swab, and had to switch to his second and go through the extraction process all over again.
Comment
Comment