Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Batch 160 Created

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by efgen
    Believe it or not, one of my project members just received results for markers 13-25 from this batch! It's only 18 days after the batch creation date and the target date wasn't until mid-August -- so this is REALLY early.
    I'm jealous. My project has plenty of tests in batches 158 and 159 that have no results yet.

    But congratulations to your lucky project member!

    Comment


    • #17
      I'm jealous too, I have several tests for my own family pending in earlier batches!

      Comment


      • #18
        I was LUCKY too! Received the results of my fathers mt-H Refine from this batch which were not due until 8/21/06.

        Awesome!

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by chris0331
          I was LUCKY too! Received the results of my fathers mt-H Refine from this batch which were not due until 8/21/06.

          Awesome!
          LUCKY!!!

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Stevo
            Expected 08/21/2006Yeah, baby!!!
            my congratulation's

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by efgen on 7/23
              Believe it or not, one of my project members just received results for markers 13-25 from this batch! It's only 18 days after the batch creation date and the target date wasn't until mid-August -- so this is REALLY early.

              He still has 26-37 and a DeepSNP-J pending, both due mid-August.
              Update: DeepSNP-J was received on 7/28. Still waiting on 26-37.

              Comment


              • #22
                Outstanding. I'm dreaming of some early 67-marker results.

                That would be nice.

                Comment


                • #23
                  SNP results

                  Just received my cousin's SNP results in this batch. Quite early. Due 8/21.

                  Here are the results

                  R1b1c
                  M173+ M207+ M269+ M343+ P25+ M126- M18- M222- M65- M73- P66- SRY2627-


                  Here is a portion of the email today from FTDNA:

                  "Remember the Haplogroup classification WILL change as the tree evolves,
                  however the test that you are positive for will NOT change. For example
                  we recently re-assigned P-25 from R1b to R1b1, as M343 (now R1b) is the
                  node of the tree in-between R1 and R1b1. We will update your specific
                  Haplogroup definition automatically in the future as the tree evolves and
                  in agreement with scientific papers."


                  Ok, I am ready for input from anyone who wants to weigh in on these results. What I am confused about it that they show P25+, yet I was told the sample was M343+, P25-, an unusual result, causing this sample to be sent to the science testing lab. And, in the meantime this SNP testing was being given complementary due to the length of time involved in testing for the unusal M343+, P25-. Does this mean the P25- reading before was incorrect?

                  Are there more results to come or is R1b1c as deep as it goes??

                  I am in the Davis Surname Project /YSearch User ID #4TWBD
                  My immigrant ancestor and country of origin is unknown.

                  Thanks for your help in advance.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    added comment

                    Re-read the information and I realize SNP testing is ongoing. Tell me if I have this right, according to SNP Tree at www.isogg.org, I have results outstanding for 1(M37), 4(M153) and 5(M160). Thanks.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      email from FTDNA

                      Received a response today from FTDNA. I asked about the discrepancy of my cousin's sample testing P25- yet it being reported as P25+ on my personal page. Here is the response:

                      "Our system is set up to reject records with inconsistent results like P25- yet M269+. Your sample did test P25- and M269+ with the Deep Clade test, and for the sake of getting the partial results uploaded to your personal page we uploaded it as P25+ since the sample definitely belongs within the clade P25 defines. We’re investigating whether it is possible to have the system also recognize results with a P25- and M269+ as R1b1c, and if we are able to successfully implement that then your results list will be changed accordingly."

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by efgen
                        Y-Refine25to67 (26-37) 160 08/23/2006
                        Y-Refine25to67 (37-67) 160 08/21/2006
                        I just received 26-37 for this kit.

                        Elise

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Early results are nice. Hope I get some from this batch.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by efgen
                            DeepSNP-J 160 08/21/2006
                            Y-Refine12to37 (13-25) 160 08/23/2006
                            Y-Refine12to37 (26-37) 160 08/23/2006
                            13-25 received 7/23
                            DeepJ received 7/28
                            26-37 received 8/4

                            This is for a project member. Can only hope that my own family's results arrive early like this one did

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Early results!

                              I just received ALL of my 67-marker upgrade this morning.

                              BOOM! Ten days early!!!

                              Yeah, baby!

                              Thank you, FTDNA! Splendid work!

                              I have already uploaded the new markers into YSearch.

                              As I anticipated, I have no 67-marker matches.

                              But that's okay. I ordered the upgrade to help with R1b research and for personal satisfaction.

                              And, if and when a real relative comes along and has his dna tested, I'll be ready!

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Congratulations, Richard!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X