Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Batch 147 created

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • rsychev
    replied
    Originally posted by M.O'Connor
    I hope so

    I believe I paid for the information.
    6 month it's unthinkable!

    Leave a comment:


  • Stevo
    replied
    Originally posted by M.O'Connor
    I hope so

    I believe I paid for the information.
    Good point.

    Leave a comment:


  • M.O'Connor
    replied
    I hope so

    I believe I paid for the information.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stevo
    replied
    Originally posted by M.O'Connor
    This 147 batch started April 9/06.

    I have been waiting 6 months!

    Should the company stop advertising certain snps that they can't give results to?
    That's a long time to wait. My M37 and P66 results are almost 3 months overdue.

    Think we'll ever get results on those SNPs?

    Leave a comment:


  • M.O'Connor
    replied
    This 147 batch started April 9/06.

    I have been waiting 6 months!

    Should the company stop advertising certain snps that they can't give results to?

    Leave a comment:


  • Stevo
    replied
    Originally posted by M.O'Connor
    still waiting for snp's...c'mon FTDNA
    Same here.

    I sent an email asking about the M37 and P66 situation a couple of days ago.

    The email response from FTDNA did not make any promises this time. It merely said that M37 and P66 proved more difficult to find than they had anticipated. They are working on the problem and hope to have results soon.

    A reasonable response.

    Okay. We wait.

    Leave a comment:


  • M.O'Connor
    replied
    still waiting for snp's...c'mon FTDNA

    Leave a comment:


  • Stevo
    replied
    Originally posted by marvallen
    Same as "old guys"....
    Different mental image for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • marvallen
    replied
    Same as "old guys"....

    Leave a comment:


  • Stevo
    replied
    Originally posted by nas
    Yee Haw,
    Old guys...old stories...old y-dna.
    Nas-IHDP
    You left out "old farts."

    Leave a comment:


  • nas
    replied
    1000 Posts

    Originally posted by M.O'Connor
    hahaha..way to go...1000 posts!..Yee Haw!
    Yee Haw,
    Old guys...old stories...old y-dna.
    Nas-IHDP

    Leave a comment:


  • M.O'Connor
    replied
    hahaha..way to go...1000 posts!..Yee Haw!

    Leave a comment:


  • Stevo
    replied
    You have 999 posts, Mike. Just one more to go!

    Leave a comment:


  • M.O'Connor
    replied
    That is a very small needle for the R1B1C haystack.

    I guess we just have to wait till others get sequenced. The back-door approach with snps doesn't seem to be helpfull at this point.... down the road after others get sequenced...maybe?

    Leave a comment:


  • Stevo
    replied
    I've kind of given up worrying about M37 and P66. Try finding R1b1c1s or R1b1c8s in any of the databases. Good luck! (The R1b1c1 listings in YSearch are bogus, BTW.)

    I think those SNPs are pretty rare.

    All the guys on John McEwan's SNP table who have a subclade are R1b1c6, R1b1c7, R1b1c9 (or 9a or 9b) or R1b1c10.

    The rest of them either haven't been S tested yet or are R1b1c* (negative for all the known R1b1c SNPs south of M269).

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X