Batch Geno 2.0

[ScooterCat]

My wife's results came in this morning. She's Mexican ancestry on both sides.

NATIVE AMERICAN: 41%
MEDITERRANEAN: 25%
NORTHERN EUROPEAN: 16%
SOUTHWEST ASIAN: 9%
SUB-SAHARAN AFRICAN: 3%
SOUTHEAST ASIAN: 3%
NORTHEAST ASIAN: 2%

2% Neanderthal, 1% Denisovan
mtDNA haplogroup C1c5

[boutrosdu93]

whaaaaaaat I hope it'ill be more precise than that or I'd be very disapointed

[JTR]

My wife's results came in this morning. She's Mexican ancestry on both sides.

NATIVE AMERICAN: 41%
MEDITERRANEAN: 25%
NORTHERN EUROPEAN: 16%
SOUTHWEST ASIAN: 9%
SUB-SAHARAN AFRICAN: 3%
SOUTHEAST ASIAN: 3%
NORTHEAST ASIAN: 2%

2% Neanderthal, 1% Denisovan
mtDNA haplogroup C1c5

When did they recieve your kit?

[ScooterCat]

whaaaaaaat I hope it'ill be more precise than that or I'd be very disapointed

That's what it is. You can also download your results in a CSV.

[ScooterCat]

When did they recieve your kit?

I honestly don't remember. The kit was ordered 9 Oct and shipped back promptly. Mine is still sitting at 60%.

[AJRL]

I honestly don't remember. The kit was ordered 9 Oct and shipped back promptly. Mine is still sitting at 60%.

And your kit was shipped back at the same time or no? In any case, that means maybe a week until mine is done (assuming there's a linear relationship between date received and date completed, which is probably not the case).

[ScooterCat]

And your kit was shipped back at the same time or no? In any case, that means maybe a week until mine is done (assuming there's a linear relationship between date received and date completed, which is probably not the case).

My kit was shipped back probably 2 days later.
Definitely not linear. Mine almost certainly went into processing a batch (or 2) later.

[DeeTyler]

From the article at http://www.yourgeneticgenealogist.co...irst-look.html

It appears as though the complete list of reference populations is:

1. African American
2. Altaian (Siberian)
3. Amerindian (Mexico)
4. Bermudian
5. Bougainville-Nasioi (Oceania)
6. British (United Kingdom)
7. Bulgarian
8. Chinese
9. Danish
10. Eastern Indian
11. Egyptian
12. Finnish
13. Georgian
14. Iberian (Spain and Portugal)
15. Iranian
16. Japanese
17. German
18. Greek
19. Highland Peruvian
20. Khoisan (Southern Africa)
21. Kinh (Vietnam)
22. Kuwaiti
23. Lebanese
24. Luhya (Kenya)
25. Malagasy (Madagascar)
26. Mexican
27. Mongolian
28. Ni-Vanuatu (Vanuatu)
29. Northern Caucasian
30. Northern Indian
31. Pamiri (Tajikistan)
32. Papuan (Papua New Guinea)
33. Peruvians from Lima
34. Puerto Rican
35. Romanian
36. Russians
37. Sardinian
38. Southern Indian
39. Tatar (Russia)
40. Tunisian
41. Tuscan
42. Western Indian
43. Yoruban (West African)

And it gives a breakdown of each of those reference populations, by the following nine regional affiliations:

Northeast Asian
Mediterranean
Southern African
Southwest Asian
Native American
Oceanian
Southeast Asian
Northern European
Sub-Saharan African

Being that we pretty much have a patchwork quilt for my ancestry (Italian - more specifically, Sicilian; Polish, German, and Colonial) I am very curious how my brother's DNA will shake out in this. Can't come fast enough. 8-)

[Bartot]

From the article at http://www.yourgeneticgenealogist.co...irst-look.html

It appears as though the complete list of reference populations is:

1. African American
2. Altaian (Siberian)
3. Amerindian (Mexico)
4. Bermudian
5. Bougainville-Nasioi (Oceania)
6. British (United Kingdom)
7. Bulgarian
8. Chinese
9. Danish
10. Eastern Indian
11. Egyptian
12. Finnish
13. Georgian
14. Iberian (Spain and Portugal)
15. Iranian
16. Japanese
17. German
18. Greek
19. Highland Peruvian
20. Khoisan (Southern Africa)
21. Kinh (Vietnam)
22. Kuwaiti
23. Lebanese
24. Luhya (Kenya)
25. Malagasy (Madagascar)
26. Mexican
27. Mongolian
28. Ni-Vanuatu (Vanuatu)
29. Northern Caucasian
30. Northern Indian
31. Pamiri (Tajikistan)
32. Papuan (Papua New Guinea)
33. Peruvians from Lima
34. Puerto Rican
35. Romanian
36. Russians
37. Sardinian
38. Southern Indian
39. Tatar (Russia)
40. Tunisian
41. Tuscan
42. Western Indian
43. Yoruban (West African)

And it gives a breakdown of each of those reference populations, by the following nine regional affiliations:

Northeast Asian
Mediterranean
Southern African
Southwest Asian
Native American
Oceanian
Southeast Asian
Northern European
Sub-Saharan African

Being that we pretty much have a patchwork quilt for my ancestry (Italian - more specifically, Sicilian; Polish, German, and Colonial) I am very curious how my brother's DNA will shake out in this. Can't come fast enough. 8-)

Did you notice that the only "italian" names are
tuscan for central and north Italy
Sardinian for sardinia

and south Italy is ???.......I was told they will call it greek

[boutrosdu93]

That's what it is. You can also download your results in a CSV.

yeaah great a csv
no but I mean there seems to be populations rather than just northen europe isn't it?

[boutrosdu93]

sorry but seing the vague results on the website in which it was tested it looks as a scam for me, I was expecting much more......

[AJRL]

Thank Jesus, Mary, and JoJo the Carpenter, I'm finally at 80% as of sometime in the past half hour.

10/16/12 - Kit received
10/16/12 - Sample returned
10/22/12 - Sample received
10/24/12-ish - Isolation underway (20%)
11/07/12 - Analysis underway (40%)
11/08/12 - Quality control underway (60%)
11/26/12 - 80%

[ScooterCat]

I've finally moved to 80% (Quality Control)!

[JTR]

Approaching 3 weeks at 60% -

I am excited though and looking forward to answering some lingering questions and playing with the data - can't wait for some third party tools.

I think the 43 populations and the 9 regions are a great way of analysing your admitixure - why are some people complaing about that?

On another site one girl filled-up 8 of those regions - the most was 24% the least was 4%. The only one she did not was Southern Africa.

[ScooterCat]

...

I think the 43 populations and the 9 regions are a great way of analysing your admitixure - why are some people complaing about that?
...

Some people just can't/won't be pleased. Probably like most people, I'd like to see more specific results, but understand that the present science can't necessarily provide them.