Go Back   Family Tree DNA Forums > Universal Lineage Testing (Autosomal DNA) > myOrigins Basics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10th January 2017, 09:33 PM
salams salams is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1
Need help with results (from Pakistan)

My results came in with (percentages): South Asian, Northern India 43; Central Asian(mainly Afghanistan) 41; European (British Isles) 10; Middle Eastern, Israel and Jordan 6.

I am 100 percent sure that my recent ancestors had zero interaction with Europeans in recent history or with the middle east. So, any idea what time frame I am looking at?

PS I know that the Aryans entered northern India around 3000 BC and mummy's found in the Taklamakan desert had blonde hair, which is unusual for that part of the world; so I am guessing there were large scale migrations, which might explain my European DNA.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11th January 2017, 10:44 AM
AFH AFH is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 291
[QUOTE=salams;434004]My results came in with (percentages): South Asian, Northern India 43; Central Asian(mainly Afghanistan) 41; European (British Isles) 10; Middle Eastern, Israel and Jordan 6.

I am 100 percent sure that my recent ancestors had zero interaction with Europeans in recent history or with the middle east. So, any idea what time frame I am looking at?

PS I know that the Aryans entered northern India around 3000 BC and mummy's found in the Taklamakan desert had blonde hair, which is unusual for that part of the world; so I am guessing there were large scale migrations, which might explain my European DNA.[/QUOTE]

I'm guessing the 10% British Isles result is due to myOrigins picking up very distant ancestry from a Yamnaya like ancestry that is found in substantial amounts in the Isles.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18th January 2018, 01:48 PM
hypnotize815 hypnotize815 is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 31
It seems like all Pakistani's have similar questions. My ancestry was quite surprising too. I have to say FTDNA is not wrong. Have you ran your raw data through GEDMatch? It gives more detailed results.

Did FTDNA give you separate percentages for South Asian?


Quote:
Originally Posted by salams View Post
My results came in with (percentages): South Asian, Northern India 43; Central Asian(mainly Afghanistan) 41; European (British Isles) 10; Middle Eastern, Israel and Jordan 6.

I am 100 percent sure that my recent ancestors had zero interaction with Europeans in recent history or with the middle east. So, any idea what time frame I am looking at?

PS I know that the Aryans entered northern India around 3000 BC and mummy's found in the Taklamakan desert had blonde hair, which is unusual for that part of the world; so I am guessing there were large scale migrations, which might explain my European DNA.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18th January 2018, 03:44 PM
MoberlyDrake MoberlyDrake is offline
mtDNA: T2b5 | Y-DNA: J-M172
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,489
I would never say that FTDNA is not wrong as far as ethnicity testing goes. For one thing, ethnicity testing is a very new science and ethnicity testing at all DNA companies is questionable. Also very small percentages may be noise. If you test at 23andMe and at Ancestry, you will probably end up with quite different results from each of the 3 companies.

FTDNA says my father has zero Sephardic, my mother has less than 2% and I am 14% Sephardic. They are clearly my parents from the amount of DNA I share with them. Since 0 + <2 does not equal 14, FTDNA is wrong with at least one of us.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21st January 2018, 09:30 AM
hypnotize815 hypnotize815 is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 31
Very interesting! Have you also uploaded your RAW files to GED Match? I thought some of my result had noise but GED Match was actually able to tell determine it wasn't noise.

With so many companies out there, I think it will be harder and harder to get precise results simply due to a lack of a large database.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoberlyDrake View Post
I would never say that FTDNA is not wrong as far as ethnicity testing goes. For one thing, ethnicity testing is a very new science and ethnicity testing at all DNA companies is questionable. Also very small percentages may be noise. If you test at 23andMe and at Ancestry, you will probably end up with quite different results from each of the 3 companies.

FTDNA says my father has zero Sephardic, my mother has less than 2% and I am 14% Sephardic. They are clearly my parents from the amount of DNA I share with them. Since 0 + <2 does not equal 14, FTDNA is wrong with at least one of us.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Whole genome sequencing of an ethnic Pathan (Pakhtun) from the north-west of Pakistan PNGarrison Scientific Papers 0 21st March 2015 04:05 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 AM.


Family Tree DNA - World Headquarters

1445 North Loop West, Suite 820
Houston, Texas 77008, USA

Phone: (713) 868-1438 | Fax: (832) 201-7147
Copyright 2001-2010 Genealogy by Genetics, Ltd.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.