Go Back   Family Tree DNA Forums > General Interest > DNA and Genealogy for Beginners

DNA and Genealogy for Beginners Everything you wanted to know about DNA and Genealogy but didn't know where to ask. This board is open to customers and visitors.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6th March 2007, 06:28 AM
nc2015 nc2015 is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 28
NY Times Article

Interesting article in today's NY Times Science section on British/Irish origins.

Reply With Quote
Old 6th March 2007, 08:13 AM
lgmayka lgmayka is offline
FTDNA Customer
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,618
It's quite hilarious to me. To support 6-marker Dr. Oppenheimer, they quote 9-marker Prof. Sykes, the same one who proclaimed a Florida man the heir to Genghis Khan based on a 7-out-of-9 marker match. The Florida man turned out to be R1a1, whereas Genghis Khan was C3.


Perhaps the most absurd claim of all is this one:
He also adopts Dr. Forster?s argument, based on a statistical analysis of vocabulary, that English is an ancient, fourth branch of the Germanic language tree, and was spoken in England before the Roman invasion.

Note that Dr. Forster is a geneticist, not a linguist, and knows very little about languages at all:


Reply With Quote
Old 6th March 2007, 02:34 PM
Johnserrat Johnserrat is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 456
It is likely some germanic language was spoken in parts of Britain before the Romans arrived. There were settlements of mixed celtic and germanic people speaking a north sea germanic language in Britain such as the Belgae. Whether the germanic language had any foothold beyond that is difficult to say. There was already a great deal of trade between Britain and the continent which we know from trade goods being found in both places and a trade language may have been spoken as well. However, to say that anything approaching english was spoken is going way to far, especially since we cannot even say that frisian, dutch or german per se were spoken at that time. The interesting articles provided by Igmayka really make it quite clear that Dr. Foster's analysis has little merit.

Reply With Quote


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 AM.

Family Tree DNA - World Headquarters

1445 North Loop West, Suite 820
Houston, Texas 77008, USA

Phone: (713) 868-1438 | Fax: (832) 201-7147
Copyright 2001-2010 Genealogy by Genetics, Ltd.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.