Go Back   Family Tree DNA Forums > Maternal Lineages (mtDNA) > mtDNA - Advanced Topics

mtDNA - Advanced Topics Users can exchange advanced information here on mtDNA testing, results, and questions. You must register and sign in to view or post in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 23rd December 2017, 07:20 AM
chr chr is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 18
hello GST, thanks for your help with that. What you've written is the most detailed I found on how GD is calculated. I just have a hard time understanding this, I tried this a few times but needed a break because I was frustrated. It seems like the calculation you mentioned does not work for the match that I'm looking at. Probably I didn't understand you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GST View Post
H10e includes the defining mutation T16093C
A: T16093C (H10e reference)
B: CT16093T! (person in H10e with reversion at 16093)
C: T16093Y

Person C is 2 step distance from person A.
Person C is 1 step distance from person B.
This looks similar to my example above, except I get GD1 instead of GD2 like in your quoted example.

H86 implies C195T (from way back group "'L2'3'4'6'"), so:

A: C195T (my match; just for this SNP: GD0 to H86 reference, GD1 to RSRS)
C: C195Y (me; just for this SNP: GD1 to H86 reference, GD1 to RSRS)

If I understand your examples right, this would mean for the calculated GD between us:
(1) each of us has like a "GD1" to RSRS for this position
(2) we also have a different value from each other in this position, so:
(3) our "GDs" to RSRS in this position are added, resulting in overall GD2 between us. Did I understand you right in that?

Unfortunately this calculation does not work for me, as I received GD1 (and not GD2!) for this match. Every other position that I can see (HVR1, HVR2) being the same apart from position 195. It barely makes sense to receive GD1 for this match, but GD2 would make even less sense.

I'm a bit disappointed that there's no info by FTDNA what concerns the actual rules of GD calculation, maybe these unknown rules also changed over time...?

Meanwhile, since I also didn't get info from FTDNA about the actual degree of my heteroplasmy (for Y: the ratio between DNA with C and DNA with T Allele) other than there's a general 20% threshold for heteroplasmy reporting, I re-tested HVR1+2 at YSEQ, and received the results last night. I'll do a post on that in the next days.

Happy Christmas everyone!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Genetic Distance (1) ??? soft heart Y-DNA Haplogroups & SNPs Basics 2 24th October 2016 06:10 PM
Genetic Distance deniseneufeld Y-DNA Haplogroups & SNPs Basics 2 14th August 2014 10:37 AM
Genetic distance of 1? trifud mtDNA - Advanced Topics 6 28th June 2014 12:44 PM
Genetic Distance vinnie DNA Success Stories 1 26th May 2007 10:29 PM
genetic distance DHDH Paternal Lineage (Y-DNA STR) Advanced 20 20th June 2006 12:08 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 AM.


Family Tree DNA - World Headquarters

1445 North Loop West, Suite 820
Houston, Texas 77008, USA

Phone: (713) 868-1438 | Fax: (832) 201-7147
Copyright 2001-2010 Genealogy by Genetics, Ltd.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.