Go Back   Family Tree DNA Forums > Universal Lineage Testing (Autosomal DNA) > Family Finder Basics

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16th October 2016, 09:59 AM
clintonslayton76 clintonslayton76 is offline
FTDNA Customer
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 243
Comments please, on "half" and "true" siblings

Determining true siblings from half-siblings by share seems a reliable test, in that two generations back from the tester is a fairly predictable "quartering" of same-grandparents and same-parents shares. Half-siblings do not normally share grandparents. But when are half-siblings truly "half"?
What if the "male in the middle" contributes to a son by wife 1, then produces a son by the sister of that wife? This scenario is quite common when a man is widowed with children, and the sisters could also possible be twins (sorry to go there). Would that not give the appearance of true siblings if those two were tested for atDNA? Wouldn't the descendants also show closer shares than descendants of different-grandparent shares?
I use sons only because these two brothers would share the Y from the father. I do not see how atDNA would be able to confirm or deny such an occurrence. I am also not clear if mtDNA is of any value here, since it seems very non-specific.
I realize that these shares become more and more randomly distributed as they are diluted down the gens, but restricting this to 3 gens, is this a reasonable stumbling-block to knowing whether these are from the same mother or from sibling mothers?
If this has been broached here before, I apologize, I find SEARCHING on these forums to seldom yield a history of such questions.

Last edited by clintonslayton76; 16th October 2016 at 10:06 AM. Reason: correction
Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2016, 11:03 AM
John McCoy John McCoy is online now
FTDNA Customer
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 712
Because the (full?) sisters who are hypothetically the mothers of two different children by the same man will end up with different parts of their parents' DNA, the total of "full matching segments" (use the One-to-one comparison tool with chromosome painting, on GEDmatch, to see this) for the sons of these two sisters will be (significantly?) less than expected for "full siblings". I haven't worked out the numbers, but I'm sure someone will be willing to chime in here.
Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2016, 07:06 AM
clintonslayton76 clintonslayton76 is offline
FTDNA Customer
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 243
Thank you

This answer makes sense in light of the randomly distributed shares from each mother, but I am not sure that it would be detectably less than with non-sibling mothers, on a 1-to-1 for cM shares, esp if the mothers were twins.
I know that in my own family we have has serial sibling marriages, but no (known) test subjects alive to test the theory.
Thanks for responding.
Reply With Quote


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any other "True P312" folks out there? Barreldriver Paternal Lineage (Y-DNA STR) Advanced 80 17th April 2016 05:11 PM
NPE victims and "true identity"... Zaru DNA and Genealogy for Beginners 27 28th September 2012 03:02 PM
Ad explanation to "My Matches" list below "Haplotree" East-Iberian Features Requests & Bug Reports Area 0 6th January 2010 11:57 PM
"DiMaggio" coming from the Albanian name "Dhima" jr76x DNA and Genealogy for Beginners 12 10th May 2008 09:27 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 PM.

Family Tree DNA - World Headquarters

1445 North Loop West, Suite 820
Houston, Texas 77008, USA

Phone: (713) 868-1438 | Fax: (832) 201-7147
Copyright 2001-2010 Genealogy by Genetics, Ltd.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.