|
The Genographic Project Do you have results from Genographic? Are you considering testing with them? This board is open to customers and visitors. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
PF SNPs
I have a new SNP, PF970. Does anyone know anything about it?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Looks English.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I would be very skeptical of this SNP on the Geno 2.0 chip. Do a Google search for "PF970+ Family Tree DNA." The results show that FTDNA customers are showing a PF970+ result on the SNP page of various haplogroup projects.
This SNP has had a positive result in men from haplogroups C, I1, E1b1a8a, R1b-Z343 and R1b-M343. There may be other haplogroups where PF970 is showing up as positive, but I think the point has been made sufficiently by citing 5 different haplogroups that have a positive result. Either the Geno 2.0 is generating false positive results for PF970 or the SNP is located in an unstable area of the y chromosome and probably isn't reliable to use for updating the haplotree. At least that's how it looks to me. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
According to the Finch it's hg A
PF970 ChrY 17678877 17678877 C to T Approx. hg: A Extracted from genome study of Sardinian samples CTS9952_F CTS9952_R |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Then there is something wrong with your eyesight.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Huh? Take a look at the map. More samples are in England than anywhere else. It's likely the higher density is because more English / Americans (with English ancestry) tested and not a true representation of the frequency.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
It looks like a hunter-gatherer SNP.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Shows up in my brother as well, and he is in an R1a1a haplogroup.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I've got it too. It showed up in my FTDNA Y-Group page.
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|