Go Back   Family Tree DNA Forums > Paternal Lineages (Y-DNA) > BIG Y and SNP Discovery

BIG Y and SNP Discovery This area is for talk about BIG Y results.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26th February 2018, 03:43 PM
adamjh adamjh is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 11
Lots of 'presumed negatve' SNPs after Big Y?

I recently had Big Y testing done on my father. On the Haplotree and SNPs portion under his Y-DNA results section, most of the SNPs in the visual tree are shown in black text (meaning they are presumed negative based on positive results elsewhere). Shouldn't most/all of these now be known to be either positive or negative now that Big Y testing has been done. At the bottom of the screen on this page, under "Tests Taken," it shows a list of positive SNPs. This is obviously too small (maybe 300 SNPs listed here?) to even be just a list of all the named variants found in the Big Y test. So what dictates what SNPs get listed at the bottom of this screen, and why are most of the SNPs listed on the Haplotree color coded as just 'presumed' negative?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26th February 2018, 08:03 PM
rod rod is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 302
I have high quality results from another company and the SNPs were named from my test. ftDNA says they're low quality or doesn't list them at all. I think the problem is ftDNA quality control and "not so bigY" coverage.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27th February 2018, 09:58 AM
dtvmcdonald dtvmcdonald is offline
mtDNA: | Big Y Pending
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 264
We are not sure how FTDNA counts SNPs. I don't know
exactly where they have the root. A person who tends the
Haplogroup A and B projects would likely know if they have access anything K or later.

Using ISOGG data for the main tree trunk and my own measurements for SNPs
between I and P2 (the junction of Q and R) and from P2 to a living people in Q, R1a and R1b,I get
typically 1080 reliable SNPs between
a Y-Adam and any living person.

I measure 435 SNPs between an I person and P2 (which means
about 217 between IJK and a living person),
221 between P2 and a Q person, 197 P2 to an R1b person and
209 from P2 to an R1a person.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28th February 2018, 03:48 PM
adamjh adamjh is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamjh View Post
I recently had Big Y testing done on my father. On the Haplotree and SNPs portion under his Y-DNA results section, most of the SNPs in the visual tree are shown in black text (meaning they are presumed negative based on positive results elsewhere). Shouldn't most/all of these now be known to be either positive or negative now that Big Y testing has been done? At the bottom of the screen on this page, under "Tests Taken," it shows a list of positive SNPs. This is obviously too small (maybe 300 SNPs listed here?) to even be just a list of all the named variants found in the Big Y test. So what dictates what SNPs get listed at the bottom of this screen, and why are most of the SNPs listed on the Haplotree color coded as just 'presumed' negative?
Okay. So I think I answered my own question by digging around in my Big Y results. There are definitely reliable SNPs in the Big Y results that are clearly positive or negative, but are just not indicated as such on the visual tree on the Haplotree and SNPs page in the Y-DNA results section of FTDNA. So it is kind of like the Big Y results area isn't really talking to that other FTDNA visual section (or at least it isn't a full conversation). There are plenty of SNPs(maybe most?) that are shown as 'Presumed Negative' on the Haplotree that are definitely negative in the Big Y results sections. Same story with the 'Presumed Positive' results.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28th February 2018, 04:17 PM
spruithean spruithean is online now
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 671
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamjh View Post
Okay. So I think I answered my own question by digging around in my Big Y results. There are definitely reliable SNPs in the Big Y results that are clearly positive or negative, but are just not indicated as such on the visual tree on the Haplotree and SNPs page in the Y-DNA results section of FTDNA. So it is kind of like the Big Y results area isn't really talking to that other FTDNA visual section (or at least it isn't a full conversation). There are plenty of SNPs(maybe most?) that are shown as 'Presumed Negative' on the Haplotree that are definitely negative in the Big Y results sections. Same story with the 'Presumed Positive' results.
I had noticed this with my results as well. The results of Big Y have not translated well to the visual representation on the Haplotree for me either. Probably a combination of my position on the tree and the haplotree's buggy interface anyway.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Presumed positive? Lilly Wicwall Paternal Lineage (Y-DNA STR) Basics 11 31st December 2016 05:23 AM
presumed haplo group sloopjohnb DNA and Genealogy for Beginners 1 7th January 2016 04:39 PM
Ordered Y 67 markers for presumed half brother Renegade6008 Paternal Lineage (Y-DNA STR) Basics 13 13th September 2015 03:23 PM
Presumed positive? Bartot Features Requests & Bug Reports Area 0 7th August 2014 02:32 PM
Lots of matches paul1801 Family Finder Advanced Topics 9 4th August 2010 05:57 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 AM.


Family Tree DNA - World Headquarters

1445 North Loop West, Suite 820
Houston, Texas 77008, USA

Phone: (713) 868-1438 | Fax: (832) 201-7147
Copyright 2001-2010 Genealogy by Genetics, Ltd.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.