Dear all,
I received from FTDNA a predicted M269 following my Y-DNA111.
Tim Janzen makes a difference between P312 and U106 using allele values/markers DYS390, DYS576 and CDYa as following:
Haplogroup DYS390 DYS576 CDYa
R-U106 23 17 37
Me 23 16 37
DYS492 (said to be a good predictor for U106 status):
R-U106: 13 (96%)
Me : 13
i am surprised that FTDNA did not used this method to confirm at least M269. Of course Y-DNA is STR test but the above looks clear to me. What you think?
On the top of that i have one match at 37 and another at 67 being U198 and at 12 a lot of L48.
My guess is therefore U198.
I received from FTDNA a predicted M269 following my Y-DNA111.
Tim Janzen makes a difference between P312 and U106 using allele values/markers DYS390, DYS576 and CDYa as following:
Haplogroup DYS390 DYS576 CDYa
R-U106 23 17 37
Me 23 16 37
DYS492 (said to be a good predictor for U106 status):
R-U106: 13 (96%)
Me : 13
i am surprised that FTDNA did not used this method to confirm at least M269. Of course Y-DNA is STR test but the above looks clear to me. What you think?
On the top of that i have one match at 37 and another at 67 being U198 and at 12 a lot of L48.
My guess is therefore U198.
Comment