Go Back   Family Tree DNA Forums > Maternal Lineages (mtDNA) > mtDNA - Genealogy Basics

mtDNA - Genealogy Basics All may view this forum, but you must register and sign in to post.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 7th August 2017, 01:30 PM
gwand gwand is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 4
Full mtDNA sequencing

I have 5 exact full mtDNA sequence matches. What does this mean in terms of recency of sharing a maternal ancestor?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 8th August 2017, 02:15 AM
J Honeychuck J Honeychuck is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 349
https://www.familytreedna.com/learn/...-relationship/

But I find that hard to fit with my own results.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 8th August 2017, 08:23 AM
MMaddi MMaddi is offline
yDNA: R-CTS2509; mtDNA: T2e
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,391
Quote:
Originally Posted by J Honeychuck View Post
https://www.familytreedna.com/learn/...-relationship/

But I find that hard to fit with my own results.
You're not the only one who thinks that FTDNA's estimates of how recently a common ancestor for an exact match in mtDNA full sequence results lived are too optimistic.

If it were the case that the 50% confidence interval was truly just 5 generations, I would expect that we'd see many success stories about how two cousins found each other through the mtDNA full sequence test. The plain fact is that any success stories are few and far between.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20th November 2017, 02:20 PM
tomcat tomcat is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jamaica Plain, MA
Posts: 3,404
Clock rate

The clock rate on human mtDNA mutations is based on the differences between human and chimpanzee mtDNA. Recently, the accepted time of divergence between human and chimp has been called into question and, if accepted, would dial way back the clock rate.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26th November 2017, 10:18 AM
keigh keigh is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 477
I'm another individual that questions the accuracy of the generations called for the FMS. I'm H10c1 with 11 matches shown for the FMS with 8 at a zero step, and 1 each at 1,2,and 3 steps. Looking for a common ancestor is just not worth the trouble, because not one match is even showing as being related to me in the FF test and all but one of my matches did the FF test. I've been in contact with the researcher who is doing the tree for the only match who hasn't done the FF test and we can't come up with anything connecting us but our mitochondrial DNA.

If the FMS test is 50% accurate for 5 generations, I'd think I'd have a good chance of having one of those 8 zero matches show up on the FF test. Twenty-two generations away for a 95% of accuracy is just too distant to really try pinning down.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26th November 2017, 11:02 AM
georgian1950 georgian1950 is online now
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 759
Something is not right with mtDNA matching methodology. I am seeing some indications that the rates of mutations and back-mutations are a lot higher than anyone suspects. I hope to be able to offer some proof of that soon. Further division of subclades seems to be going too far, as those states are probably not very stable.

Jack
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 1st August 2018, 02:34 AM
Mww0128 Mww0128 is offline
mtDNA - J2a1a1b
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Alabama
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMaddi View Post
You're not the only one who thinks that FTDNA's estimates of how recently a common ancestor for an exact match in mtDNA full sequence results lived are too optimistic.

If it were the case that the 50% confidence interval was truly just 5 generations, I would expect that we'd see many success stories about how two cousins found each other through the mtDNA full sequence test. The plain fact is that any success stories are few and far between.
My only 0 step FMS match is exactly 5 generations back. I took the test to attempt to crack my 3rd great grandmotherís brick wall, and that 0 match is her sisterís descendant
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 3rd August 2018, 12:25 PM
Serket Serket is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 93
The chart says 5 to 22 generations. I can do 14 generations in my line. I haven't checked my mtDNA matches for a while so I don't remember exactly how many total matches I have or how many are exact matches. I contacted one man and he said he didn't know much about his ancestry, but he was going to pass the information onto the family genealogist but I never heard back. Another match was a woman and her husband responded to me and said his wife could only trace her line back a few generations and didn't recognize any of mine but he didn't tell me any details about her family.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Defining a New Rate Constant for Y-Chromosome SNPs based on Full Sequencing Data jbarry6899 BIG Y and SNP Discovery 1 20th March 2015 02:51 PM
Full mtDNA sequencing completed, but no results? lgmayka Features Requests & Bug Reports Area 9 10th July 2014 05:16 PM
Phylogenetic Structure of Q-M378 Subclade Based On Full Y-Chromosome Sequencing Shad Scientific Papers 4 22nd May 2014 05:22 AM
Full Y-chromosome sequencing KCWelch DNA and Genealogy for Beginners 4 19th September 2013 03:14 PM
Exome and Full Genomic Sequencing KCWelch DNA and Genealogy for Beginners 4 31st March 2013 12:41 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 PM.


Family Tree DNA - World Headquarters

1445 North Loop West, Suite 820
Houston, Texas 77008, USA

Phone: (713) 868-1438 | Fax: (832) 201-7147
Copyright 2001-2010 Genealogy by Genetics, Ltd.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.