Go Back   Family Tree DNA Forums > Family Tree DNA Communications > Grumbles & Gripes

Grumbles & Gripes This is a place for free and open grumbling, griping, and venting about anything and everything about DNA, companies, and genealogy that irks you. You may even come here to complain about the Forums and how they are run.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 15th April 2018, 04:11 PM
Epiphyte Epiphyte is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRNewcomb View Post
Then I tripped into a discussion on these forums about tracking down sperm donors to sue them for genetic ailments.
When you really think about it, it would be pretty hard for anyone to sue a sperm donor for a genetic disease. The donor conceived individual would have to prove that the donor knew they were carriers of a bad gene and intentionally omitted this information from their health history at the time of donation. If the donor conceived person wanted to sue the institution that screened the donor and processed the specimen, they would have to prove that the institution did not follow the standard of care at the time. Several decades ago, it was not possible to screen for many illnesses. Even today, screening for many diseases is only done if there is a specific indication. The parents who used the reproductive technology probably signed consent forms that discussed the various risks. I am sure the clinics probably take all the precautions they can to prevent wrongful birth lawsuits.

We all carry bad genes and are capable of passing them along to our offspring. Many of the genes are recessive so you will never know if you are a carrier unless you test or have an afflicted child who had the misfortune of inheriting copies of the same bad gene from both parents. Examples: Tay-Sachs disease gene carrier rates range from 1/27 in the American Jewish population to 1/250 in the general population. Carrier rate is also increased in French Canadians in the St Lawrence River area, Cajuns in Louisiana, and Irish Americans (1/50). Cystic Fibrosis prevalence: 1/2000-3000 births in EU and 1/3500 births in USA. So you have around 1/50 chance of being a carrier of the CF gene in the USA. Source: World Health Org website.

There is a much greater risk of DNA test-inflicted family drama with these unexpected results: unknown half-siblings, adoptions, father is not your biological father, unexpected ethnic results. If your family would not be able to handle these situations, best to avoid testing altogether. There is a YouTube video sponsored by Ancestry that discusses unexpected results with DNA testing. It has been watched many times!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 15th April 2018, 04:25 PM
dna dna is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by Epiphyte View Post
[----] There is a much greater risk of DNA test-inflicted family drama with these unexpected results: unknown half-siblings, adoptions, father is not your biological father, unexpected ethnic results. If your family would not be able to handle these situations, best to avoid testing altogether. There is a YouTube video sponsored by Ancestry that discusses unexpected results with DNA testing. It has been watched many times!
And then those conceived with a donor sperm are playing a Russian roulette each time they meet someone. Is she or he their half-sibling? In "ordinary cases of an unknown father", at least time and place were more or less known...


Mr. W.


P.S. I agree that the legal documents probably protect the donor companies, but the whole idea that the donor in 2018 knows something about his DNA (many illnesses manifest in later years, but can be managed from an early age) and will not tell his children...

Somehow the old stories about trying with a neighbour start sounding like a better proposition...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 15th April 2018, 06:10 PM
DRNewcomb DRNewcomb is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: MS Gulf Coast
Posts: 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by Epiphyte View Post
When you really think about it, it would be pretty hard for anyone to sue a sperm donor for a genetic disease. .......
I really don't want to invite a repeat of a thread which we both may recall but lets just say it's not worth the risk of just having someone harass and threaten you, or your family, over the issue.
Quote:
There is a much greater risk of DNA test-inflicted family drama with these unexpected results: .....
There's also that. I may not be ready to have a warm family reunion with some, previously unknown, half sibling. It may be something I'd prefer to break slowly to the family.

I know of one person who was conceived in an orgy and was looking for his father. That's one reunion I'd be reluctant to hang on any of my family; regardless of the current or future legal environment.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 15th April 2018, 11:14 PM
Carpathian Carpathian is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRNewcomb View Post
You're doing better than I am. Every time I see a tree on Ancestry, it's total garbage. Everything references "World Family Tree" or someone else's tree and when you track down the references they all end up at a tree with no documentation. Like paying a game of "Rumors". I started a thread on Ancestry's forums a while back, titled, "Does anyone do real genealogy any more?" The moniker I hung on Ancestry.com is, "Where a whole lot of people go to do really bad genealogy."
IMO, it's more like "where a whole lot of people go to get free information" from copy & pasted trees, once they are publicly posted, usually with no effort involved in gathering that. The sad part is that most people don't know or care whether whatever they find there is accurate or not. It's often like the blind leading the blind. But Ancestry provides that feature as a venue and they are laughing all the way to the bank, due to its popularity.

"If ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise."
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 15th April 2018, 11:20 PM
ewd76 ewd76 is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carpathian View Post
But Ancestry provides that feature as a venue and they are laughing all the way to the bank, due to its popularity.
There are some hilarious Ancestry commercial parodies om Youtube.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 16th April 2018, 05:33 AM
DRNewcomb DRNewcomb is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: MS Gulf Coast
Posts: 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by ewd76 View Post
There are some hilarious Ancestry commercial parodies om Youtube.
I never saw those before. They are funny.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 16th April 2018, 06:35 AM
spruithean spruithean is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kohlehydrat View Post
this is satire, no?

edited to add: i actually have archduke johann of the imperial house of hapsburg-lorraine on my tree. not a direct relative as he is the husband of the aunt of the husband of my 2nd cousin 3 times removed. *lol*
I think most people of Western European descent are descended from Charlemagne. However I'm not sure one can put Norse deities in their tree with any level of certainty...
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 16th April 2018, 08:17 PM
wombat wombat is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDHOTLEN View Post
In some cases I have the feeling that notables, such as politicians, admirals, generals, movie stars, etc., don't want to reveal themselves or their trees.
Most of the time I don't think it has anything to do with that. I see so many private trees and I don't think they can all be from well known people (and with my ancestry it would be something of a shock if even a single match was).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Private Trees Gwen Myers Grumbles & Gripes 7 18th January 2017 12:12 PM
Private Trees at FTDNA phje Grumbles & Gripes 5 24th November 2014 12:45 PM
Blocking matches who have private trees or don't link DNA to tree ERHill66 Features Requests & Bug Reports Area 24 2nd October 2014 10:08 AM
Autosomal DNA and Private Trees mebrowndfw Family Finder Advanced Topics 30 6th July 2013 05:52 PM
Re Private dello Paternal Lineage (Y-DNA STR) Advanced 1 17th March 2012 09:44 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 PM.


Family Tree DNA - World Headquarters

1445 North Loop West, Suite 820
Houston, Texas 77008, USA

Phone: (713) 868-1438 | Fax: (832) 201-7147
Copyright 2001-2010 Genealogy by Genetics, Ltd.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.