Go Back   Family Tree DNA Forums > General Interest > Scientific Papers

Scientific Papers For talk of scientific papers on population genetics, archaeology, and anthropology related to DNA and personal ancestry testing.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 9th December 2014, 09:06 AM
Armando Armando is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,702
MJost calculated M269 to be from 9870 BC or 11,870 ybp.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 9th December 2014, 10:52 AM
D.Clade D.Clade is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: California
Posts: 203
Quote:
Originally Posted by T E Peterman View Post
My uncle is R1b CTS7822.

Timothy Peterman
Timothy,
Please make sure your uncle is a member of the R1b1a2 (P312- U106-) DNA Project (aka ht35 Project). An updated project phylogenetic research tree was posted yesterday. This tree includes data from the Hallast paper that is the subject of this thread.

The Roman theories for the R1b-Z2103 clades in the Isles are out there. My problem with those theories is after 1600+ years, one would expect to see more R1b-Z2103 in the Isles than we are seeing. Perhaps something more recent like the Normans or Romanichals need to be considered too.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 9th December 2014, 11:49 AM
1798 1798 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 4,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by T E Peterman View Post
I assume that you are talking about novel variants. I have 96 of them. Over 30 of them are shared with all other U152 participants, which indicates that they are higher on the tree. Has the tsunami been organized into a hierarchy of clades nested under clades? This usually can't happen until two "unrelated" participants are found to share a clade defining SNP that isn't shared by other participants.

Any chance you could upload an image of the hige U106 tree?

Timothy Peterman
https://app.box.com/s/afqsrrnvv2d51msqcz2o
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 9th December 2014, 02:16 PM
T E Peterman T E Peterman is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,577
Thank you Ciaran. The link shows U106 with 16 levels at the deepest. At 135 years per SNP, that is 2160 years at the minimum average. Again, I don't think U106 is that young. I think 4,000 to 4,500 is more likely, but there is no evidence here supporting 6,000 years.

D. Clade, My uncle (kit 16910) has been part of the ht35 project for years. Unless more have been identified recently, Robinson, Seymour & Bennett are the only English surnames that are part of the R1b CTS7822 clade. I just bought an upgrade for my uncle to the Big Y.
Regarding the Romanichal possibility, my maternal uncle doesn't show any South Asian at Eurogenes13, but who knows, it could be a long way back. Now, my father & paternal uncles & their maternal Hall first cousins and second cousins do show South Asian at a low percentage (1% to 3%); they do have a complexion, hair color & eye color that is darker than normal for the Isles. I suspect that my g-g grandfather, James William Hall (1827-1874) may have had a substantial amount of Romanichal ancestry. I can't say for sure yet, but genetic indications make it more than plausible. The Halls are R1b L2, and go back to a family in Wiltshire, England. Which analysis tool do you think givers the best indication of Romanichal ancestry. Are they 100% South Asian? Or is the percentage lower?

I was browsing Eupedia earlier today & was pleased to see that Pres. John Adams is reported to be R1b L11*. Now for the story. I have a line of descent that goes back to Henry Adams & Edith Squire, who settled Braintree, MA back in the 1600s. I descend from Pelatiah Adams. A few years ago, I was trying to collect y-DNA haplogroup info for as many of my lines of descent as possible. I could see that the Henry Adams family was represented, but all were just estimated to be R1b M269. I contacted the administrator of the Adams Surname project & said that I would like to see a deep clade SNP test done on the one who was most closely related to my line. The participant agreed & I paid for the upgrade. When the results were posted, we learned that the Adams family (including the two Presidents) is L11*. I'm glad to see that this result is now getting wider recognition.

Timothy Peterman
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 9th December 2014, 03:55 PM
1798 1798 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 4,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by T E Peterman View Post
Thank you Ciaran. The link shows U106 with 16 levels at the deepest. At 135 years per SNP, that is 2160 years at the minimum average. Again, I don't think U106 is that young. I think 4,000 to 4,500 is more likely, but there is no evidence here supporting 6,000 years.

D. Clade, My uncle (kit 16910) has been part of the ht35 project for years. Unless more have been identified recently, Robinson, Seymour & Bennett are the only English surnames that are part of the R1b CTS7822 clade. I just bought an upgrade for my uncle to the Big Y.
Regarding the Romanichal possibility, my maternal uncle doesn't show any South Asian at Eurogenes13, but who knows, it could be a long way back. Now, my father & paternal uncles & their maternal Hall first cousins and second cousins do show South Asian at a low percentage (1% to 3%); they do have a complexion, hair color & eye color that is darker than normal for the Isles. I suspect that my g-g grandfather, James William Hall (1827-1874) may have had a substantial amount of Romanichal ancestry. I can't say for sure yet, but genetic indications make it more than plausible. The Halls are R1b L2, and go back to a family in Wiltshire, England. Which analysis tool do you think givers the best indication of Romanichal ancestry. Are they 100% South Asian? Or is the percentage lower?

I was browsing Eupedia earlier today & was pleased to see that Pres. John Adams is reported to be R1b L11*. Now for the story. I have a line of descent that goes back to Henry Adams & Edith Squire, who settled Braintree, MA back in the 1600s. I descend from Pelatiah Adams. A few years ago, I was trying to collect y-DNA haplogroup info for as many of my lines of descent as possible. I could see that the Henry Adams family was represented, but all were just estimated to be R1b M269. I contacted the administrator of the Adams Surname project & said that I would like to see a deep clade SNP test done on the one who was most closely related to my line. The participant agreed & I paid for the upgrade. When the results were posted, we learned that the Adams family (including the two Presidents) is L11*. I'm glad to see that this result is now getting wider recognition.

Timothy Peterman
A lot of SNPs from the Big-Y have not been added. The average number of variants at present under U106 is 36.You are right, at 135 years per SNP it would not be 6000. The scientists have not established a definitive date for any subhaplogroup as yet.The reason that I suggest a date of 6000 years is it is in line with the Neolithic population explosion. From P311 downstream there are thousands of separate SNP branches unlike above it where there seems to be a lot of bottlenecks. Some R1b branches cannot have avoided the Neolithic.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 9th December 2014, 05:32 PM
T E Peterman T E Peterman is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,577
Have the new SNPs from the Big Y been isolated to lower branches of the U106 tree. Of my 96 novel variants (I am R1b L20*), about 1/3 are higher than U152 on the tree. All of the novel variants are new; they haven't been seen before. But it doesn't mean they are outlining new structure beneath the most derived clades on the y-tree. I suspect that Big Y will result in maybe 3 or 4 nested clades under each pre-Big Y terminal clade, but not much more.

All of the new U106 Big Y SNPs will extend it down to maybe 20 levels deep across the board; maybe deeper in some cases.

Timothy Peterman
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 9th December 2014, 06:46 PM
similligan similligan is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Maryland USA
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by T E Peterman View Post
I was browsing Eupedia earlier today & was pleased to see that Pres. John Adams is reported to be R1b L11*. Now for the story. I have a line of descent that goes back to Henry Adams & Edith Squire, who settled Braintree, MA back in the 1600s. I descend from Pelatiah Adams. A few years ago, I was trying to collect y-DNA haplogroup info for as many of my lines of descent as possible. I could see that the Henry Adams family was represented, but all were just estimated to be R1b M269. I contacted the administrator of the Adams Surname project & said that I would like to see a deep clade SNP test done on the one who was most closely related to my line. The participant agreed & I paid for the upgrade. When the results were posted, we learned that the Adams family (including the two Presidents) is L11*. I'm glad to see that this result is now getting wider recognition.

Timothy Peterman
This Adams line has been moved down a little farther now. I did Big Y on my Henry Adams descendant and he went down through CTS4528/DF100 to S6868, plus there are more then 30 novel variants still to be accounted for. He is in the ht35 project

Susan
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 9th December 2014, 09:42 PM
T E Peterman T E Peterman is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,577
Excellent news on the Adams family. I see that clade now and thanks. Looks like this is nested under P311. ISOGG appears to be in the process of merging L51, P310 and P311 as a replacement to L11. Do you have any information regarding this change?

Timothy Peterman
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10th December 2014, 04:17 AM
Wing_Genealogis Wing_Genealogis is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Waterville, ME
Posts: 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by T E Peterman View Post
Thank you Ciaran. The link shows U106 with 16 levels at the deepest. At 135 years per SNP, that is 2160 years at the minimum average. Again, I don't think U106 is that young. I think 4,000 to 4,500 is more likely, but there is no evidence here supporting 6,000 years.

[SNIP]
Timothy Peterman
What is missing from this tree is all of the "Singleton" (ie SNPs not shared with any other U106+ Big Y tester). Some folks have only a couple of Singleton SNPs (as they have a fairly close relative tested). On the other end, we do have someone who has no currently share clade below U106 who has 41 Singletons. On average, there are roughly 20 singleton SNPs per individual. (20*135= 2700 years to be added to your 2160 age)
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10th December 2014, 04:18 AM
T E Peterman T E Peterman is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,577
Correction. Thanks to my computer screen & glasses, I said L51 was being collapsed into the replacement clade for L11. ISOGG actually shows L151.

Timothy Peterman
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FREE Webinar - Family Tree DNA Feature Launch: X Chromosome Matches in Family Finder Rebekah Canada X-DNA Basics 2 24th January 2014 07:27 PM
Chromosome Depictions in Chromosome Browser BenTurin Family Finder Advanced Topics 6 18th August 2011 01:37 AM
New YCC tree Kuwaiti Group Administrators - Advanced Chat 0 8th November 2010 08:29 AM
NEW R1a TREE SEREGA784 DNA and Genealogy for Beginners 2 11th February 2010 02:08 AM
New Y CHromosome Tree Kaiser DNA and Genealogy for Beginners 12 10th April 2008 07:36 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 AM.


Family Tree DNA - World Headquarters

1445 North Loop West, Suite 820
Houston, Texas 77008, USA

Phone: (713) 868-1438 | Fax: (832) 201-7147
Copyright 2001-2010 Genealogy by Genetics, Ltd.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.