Go Back   Family Tree DNA Forums > Universal Lineage Testing (Autosomal DNA) > myOrigins Basics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 17th February 2018, 02:05 PM
Lani Friend Lani Friend is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 34
Half Norwegian but 0% Scandinavian, WHY?

My Origins results are 97% British Isles. My mother was full Norwegian (records back to 1600s). My Dad was full BI. I have "matches" with all of my mother's surnames back to 1600s.

1) Could these results go back to Viking times when Vikings brought Irish men and women back to Norway as slaves and concubines?
2) Could all these Norwegian ancestors have BI DNA? Was there a British/Irish/Scottish invasion of the Sognefjord that we don't know about?
3) NPE? When?
4) Could I have inherited ONLY my father's DNA and somehow my mother's just disappeared?

Why is there not even 1% Scandinavian showing when there are so many Norw. Matches in Norway and elsewhere?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17th February 2018, 02:53 PM
clintonslayton76 clintonslayton76 is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 240
Please do not interpret MyOrigins as much more than an entertaining series of guesses. Lots of people in the BI are rooted in Nordic lines, and there is no such thing as "Norwegian" DNA. The system of spreading DNA through the BI was certainly a Viking specialty. Being "full" Norwegian does not mean that your mother's ancient DNA did not travel across the Balkans.

My Haplo expert describes my Y Haplo as anciently "Anglo-Saxon," and current male populations in Gothenberg Sweden are just loaded with my haplo-mates, possibly more concentrated there than in England.

So it made sense that MyOrigins once showed me as mostly British, with a large chunk (over 30%) Scandinavian, and 2% South-Central Asian.

Today it shows me as 88% Brit, 3% Iberian and 6% Sephardic Jew! My Scandinavian is gone! My Jewish roots were previously unsuspected. My Asian trace made sense to me as a possible Native American connection, but now it is relegated to <2% trace results!

Please do not take these things seriously, your complaint is echoed across this forum as possibly the Number One cry: "Why does my [heritage] not show?" One day it might, and will still be an interpretation of something that is basically unknowable. Our genes just frankly don't give a damn about geopolitical divisions, religion or cultural norms and most of them go all over the place.

Last edited by clintonslayton76; 17th February 2018 at 03:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17th February 2018, 04:29 PM
Lani Friend Lani Friend is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by clintonslayton76 View Post
Please do not interpret MyOrigins as much more than an entertaining series of guesses. Lots of people in the BI are rooted in Nordic lines, and there is no such thing as "Norwegian" DNA. The system of spreading DNA through the BI was certainly a Viking specialty. Being "full" Norwegian does not mean that your mother's ancient DNA did not travel across the Balkans.

My Haplo expert describes my Y Haplo as anciently "Anglo-Saxon," and current male populations in Gothenberg Sweden are just loaded with my haplo-mates, possibly more concentrated there than in England.

So it made sense that MyOrigins once showed me as mostly British, with a large chunk (over 30%) Scandinavian, and 2% South-Central Asian.

Today it shows me as 88% Brit, 3% Iberian and 6% Sephardic Jew! My Scandinavian is gone! My Jewish roots were previously unsuspected. My Asian trace made sense to me as a possible Native American connection, but now it is relegated to <2% trace results!

Please do not take these things seriously, your complaint is echoed across this forum as possibly the Number One cry: "Why does my [heritage] not show?" One day it might, and will still be an interpretation of something that is basically unknowable. Our genes just frankly don't give a damn about geopolitical divisions, religion or cultural norms and most of them go all over the place.
Many thanks for your detailed insights. Your case is quite instructive in this regard, and I appreciate your sharing of your results. Amazing how some percentages just seem to disappear!

Does anyone else have possible answers to my questions?

Very grateful for any responses...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17th February 2018, 04:41 PM
spruithean spruithean is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 653
It's doubtful that your autosomal results trace back to Viking times. That is quite far back and it is doubtful we share any autosomal DNA with ancestors from that period of time.

I cannot comment on the ethnicity results or compare them to my own scenario, but I agree with clintonslayton in that you shouldn't read too much into the results.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17th February 2018, 06:39 PM
josh w. josh w. is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lani Friend View Post
My Origins results are 97% British Isles. My mother was full Norwegian (records back to 1600s). My Dad was full BI. I have "matches" with all of my mother's surnames back to 1600s.

1) Could these results go back to Viking times when Vikings brought Irish men and women back to Norway as slaves and concubines?
2) Could all these Norwegian ancestors have BI DNA? Was there a British/Irish/Scottish invasion of the Sognefjord that we don't know about?
3) NPE? When?
4) Could I have inherited ONLY my father's DNA and somehow my mother's just disappeared?

Why is there not even 1% Scandinavian showing when there are so many Norw. Matches in Norway and elsewhere?

I don't know how this fits in but there is evidence that Vikings from Sognefjord invaded Ireland. Irish treasure on the north shore.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17th February 2018, 07:50 PM
prairielad prairielad is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,007
My mothers the opposite. She is 50% English ,50% Scandinavian

She shows 90% Scandinavian, 4% British isle, 6% Southern Europe

Her 3siblings show 59%, 79% and 84% scandinavian
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17th February 2018, 08:19 PM
Lani Friend Lani Friend is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 34
[QUOTE=spruithean;448618]It's doubtful that your autosomal results trace back to Viking times. That is quite far back and it is doubtful we share any autosomal DNA with ancestors from that period of time.

Thanks, yes it does seem improbable, but that would be an explanation of how so many ancestors in this region (Sognefjord) inherited BI DNA. I just can't figure out any other historical explanation for Irish/Scottish/English markers in these people since they were so isolated. If they all descended from British Isle slaves, they would share that DNA.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17th February 2018, 08:22 PM
Lani Friend Lani Friend is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by prairielad View Post
My mothers the opposite. She is 50% English ,50% Scandinavian

She shows 90% Scandinavian, 4% British isle, 6% Southern Europe

Her 3siblings show 59%, 79% and 84% scandinavian
Many British people inherited Scandinavian DNA from the Viking invasions and settlements, so that could account for her extra Scandinavian % and that of her siblings.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 17th February 2018, 08:22 PM
Lani Friend Lani Friend is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by josh w. View Post
I don't know how this fits in but there is evidence that Vikings from Sognefjord invaded Ireland. Irish treasure on the north shore.
What are your sources for this? I would like to read more about it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 17th February 2018, 08:25 PM
Lani Friend Lani Friend is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by spruithean View Post

I cannot comment on the ethnicity results or compare them to my own scenario, but I agree with clintonslayton in that you shouldn't read too much into the results.
So are you saying there could be an error with FT calculations? That it's just not that accurate?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Segment shared with many Finnish/Norwegian matvhes jbower Family Finder Basics 7 24th February 2017 06:58 PM
Told he was English found out through DNA 1/2 Norwegian LilaJ Adoptees Forum 5 2nd February 2017 06:54 PM
Where did my Scandinavian DNA come from? dcx4610 myOrigins Basics 7 30th August 2016 07:55 PM
Half siblings vs. half aunt/niece Juanita Family Finder Basics 11 11th February 2015 09:19 PM
Norwegian results? henrials Family Finder Advanced Topics 13 17th August 2012 11:34 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19 AM.


Family Tree DNA - World Headquarters

1445 North Loop West, Suite 820
Houston, Texas 77008, USA

Phone: (713) 868-1438 | Fax: (832) 201-7147
Copyright 2001-2010 Genealogy by Genetics, Ltd.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.