Go Back   Family Tree DNA Forums > General Interest > The Genographic Project

The Genographic Project Do you have results from Genographic? Are you considering testing with them? This board is open to customers and visitors.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29th May 2017, 09:39 AM
RHernandez RHernandez is offline
FTDNA Customer
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 2
Regional difference between FTDNA and Genographic

Both my father and mother's families immigrated from Mexico. I've traced my family tree to Mexico and Spain.

My Genographic DNA lists my regional heritage as:

47% Southern European
29% Native American
10% East Asian
6% West African
4% Finish/Siberian

When I uploaded my DNA results to FTDNA May 2016 the results where the same as Genographic.

As of today, the Genographic regional analysis has not changed but the FTDNA regional analysis has changed to:

45% European
45% New World
5% African

and trace results for:

East Central Africa
North Africa
Northeast Asia
South Central Africa

I don't understand the changes to my regional analysis on FTDNA. Can someone explain the disparity between the two?
Reply With Quote
Old 31st May 2017, 04:55 PM
Armando Armando is offline
FTDNA Customer
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,702
All of the companies have added or increased reference populations and their methodology over the years. Even though ethnicity calculators have been around for a while it is still relatively new. That being said some companies do better than others so there is a high likelihood neither of your results are as good as they should be.

Your Geno 2.0 results used the old myOrigins calculator that gave you way too much Northeast Asia and Finish/Siberian which was from your Native American DNA from when our ancestors crossed over the Bering Strait from Siberia and Northeast Asia. That was about 18,000 years ago. It doesn't take that long for drift to occur so it was ridiculous that Native American DNA was broken up like that. When myOrigins 2.0 came out they improved the Native American calculator by adding back in some populations that should have included in the previous version of myOrigins. It is one of the few components (ethnicities) that has a high accuracy for a very large percentage of testers.

So your 45% New World in myOrigins 2.0 is from your 29% Native American, 10% East Asian, and 4% Finish/Siberian. The other 2% is from the other DNA that was under estimated with myOrigins 1.0/Geno 2.0.

If you upload to Gedmatch and get a DNA test with 23andme and Ancestry.com you will that they will also give you about 45% Native American & East Asian.
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2017, 04:25 PM
RHernandez RHernandez is offline
FTDNA Customer
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 2

Thanks Armando. Your analysis is very helpful. Makes sense.

Reply With Quote


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Difference in Segment Length Reported by FTDNA and 23andMe MoberlyDrake Family Finder Advanced Topics 6 4th December 2016 12:47 PM
Genographic 2.0 vs Other FTDNA Tests djknox DNA and Genealogy for Beginners 0 10th September 2012 04:50 AM
Genographic R1b or FTDNA R1b1 Which one? JWH The Genographic Project 2 19th June 2006 12:44 PM
Genographic Project vs FTDNA maratha The Genographic Project 5 7th June 2006 05:47 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 AM.

Family Tree DNA - World Headquarters

1445 North Loop West, Suite 820
Houston, Texas 77008, USA

Phone: (713) 868-1438 | Fax: (832) 201-7147
Copyright 2001-2010 Genealogy by Genetics, Ltd.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.