I think Z209 was the Goths. It looks like the map from Wikipedia.
Z209 was the Goths
Collapse
X
-
Modern distribution of Y-DNA doesn't always match origin. Since it is hypothesized that subclades of R1b-M269 went into western Europe from the Steppe in the Bronze Age and there was no such thing as Goths in the Bronze Age. Since Z209 is an ancestor of M153 which is found only in Basques and also Z209 is a descendant of DF27 and the Basques have the highest frequency of DF27 of Europe then the source of Z209 can't be pinpointed to an historical or specific language group. If the origin could be pinpointed to a language group it would more likely be a proto-Celtic group.
-
-
I tend to agree with Armando on this. It's fun to speculate about the deep ancestry of our paternal line. But in the absence of a positive SNP result from ancient DNA proving that a specific subclade was present in some ancient population, it remains speculation, something like the stories about King Arthur and his Round Table.
With that said, I do believe that the downstream subclade (FGC13486) established in the Big Y results of myself and two other matches may have been present in the Goths or Lombards who came to Italy after the Roman Empire fell (about 500 AD) and set up relatively short-lived kingdoms. All three of us are FGC13486+ and have Italian ancestry, one with northern Italian ancestry and myself and the other Sicilian/southern Italian ancestry. The age estimate by Iain McDonald, a co-administrator of the R1b-U106 Project, is that FGC13486 arose about 259 AD. Since R1b-U106 and its subclades are mainly northern European and are especially found among Germanic populations and are not common at all in Italy, a Goth or Lombard line bringing my subclade to Italy seems plausible. However, until someone finds that the remains of a Goth or Lombard from the period of their kingdoms in Italy is FGC13486+, it's merely a plausible theory on my part, not proven.Last edited by MMaddi; 4 March 2017, 02:38 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MMaddi View PostI tend to agree with Armando on this. It's fun to speculate about the deep ancestry of our paternal line. But in the absence of a positive SNP result from ancient DNA proving that a specific subclade was present in some ancient population, it remains speculation, something like the stories about King Arthur and his Round Table.
With that said, I do believe that the downstream subclade (FGC13486) established in the Big Y results of myself and two other matches may have been present in the Goths or Lombards who came to Italy after the Roman Empire fell (about 500 AD) and set up relatively short-lived kingdoms. All three of us are FGC13486+ and have Italian ancestry, one with northern Italian ancestry and myself and the other Sicilian/southern Italian ancestry. The age estimate by Iain McDonald, a co-administrator of the R1b-U106 Project, is that FGC13486 arose about 259 AD. Since R1b-U106 and its subclades are mainly northern European and are especially found among Germanic populations and are not common at all in Italy, a Goth or Lombard line bringing my subclade to Italy seems plausible. However, until someone finds that the remains of a Goth or Lombard from the period of their kingdoms in Italy is FGC13486+, it's merely a plausible theory on my part, not proven.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Armando View PostIt is a lot easier to speculate about much younger SNPs from the historical period such as yours as opposed to SNPs that have a TMRCA of 4400 ybp which is about when the Steppe people went into western Europe and writing didn't even exist in that part of the world nor did many of the languages of the historical period.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by benowicz View PostThe map doesn't look any different to me.
Comment
-
-
The map shows the Goths starting up in north Poland and ending up in north Spain, just like Z209. The map doesn't say when those Z209 people were tested, but I doubt it was 4,400 years ago. So I think it's still open to prove that it wasn't the Goths. Probably it was.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by benowicz View PostThe map shows the Goths starting up in north Poland and ending up in north Spain, just like Z209.
Originally posted by benowicz View PostThe map doesn't say when those Z209 people were tested, but I doubt it was 4,400 years ago.
Originally posted by benowicz View PostSo I think it's still open to prove that it wasn't the Goths. Probably it was.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by benowicz View PostWe will just have to agree to disagree.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MMaddi View PostIf you agree with the scientific method and simple logic, then you have to admit that your theory amounts to speculation, at least until the point that Z209 is found in Goth remains from before the period that they entered Spain.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by benowicz View PostExcept for the map it is all speculation. That study he cited hasn't even been performed yet. So the Goths still are in the running. Everyone is entitled to their opinion.
Comment
-
-
For evidence of 4,400 years of age you submitted a study that hasn't been performed yet. So this point is also speculation.
I think my idea of mutual tolerance should be respected. If I tolerate someone, but they insist not to tolerate me that makes them look not so good.
Comment
-
Comment