Go Back   Family Tree DNA Forums > Universal Lineage Testing (Autosomal DNA) > Family Finder Advanced Topics

Family Finder Advanced Topics Advanced discussion about Family Tree DNA's Family Finder Product.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 3rd June 2018, 02:55 PM
Gnarlodious Gnarlodious is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 41
Yes, Anglo-Saxon

My results came in telling me “British Isles”, which I had to laugh at. Through traditional genealogy going many generations back, I know I have I have zero British Isles ancestors.

But I studied. And what I discovered was that my Danish ancestors were Angles (from northern Denmark) and my German ancestors were Saxons (from lower Saxony). An easy mistake to make on the part of FTDNA.

This was revolutionary though, because according to St Bede, who wrote on the Angles and Saxons migrating to Britannia, The regions of Anglia and Saxony were completely depopulated by the migration.

The DNA refutes this strident claim. There must have been enough of a remaining gene pool in both regions to bring the original Angle and Saxon DNA forward into modern times.

To give St Bede a break, he may have been referring to lower Denmark and upper Saxony. Those two regions do adjoin, and the alliance and migration may have been limited to those two neighbors. They could well have been depopulated, with the aforementioned gene pools remaining in the more geographically extreme areas of Denmark and Germany.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 6th June 2018, 02:25 PM
JSW JSW is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 316
I have a family member 100% German as defined by
all 4 grandparents born in Germany (Central and Eastern)
Results are

European 99%
British Isles 75%
East Europe 24%

Thus using family finder to sort East vs West out is going
difficult if not impossible.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 13th June 2018, 09:59 AM
MrsCHerrera MrsCHerrera is offline
FTDNA Customer
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 1
I got the opposite result here at FTDNA. However, testing with LivingDNA I did get that result.

Family Tree DNA results:

British Isles 26%

Western Europe 68% (this includes both my French heritage and my German. My great Grandmother was 100% French (Canadian), but my paternal grandmother and my maternal grandfather also had a lot of German.

I also have 3% Southeast Europe, and trace regions in Finnish, Oceania, central asian (India), and North/central American.

I have a lot of Scottish via paper trail, yet I didn't specifically get Scottish/Irish to come up in the DNA here.

At LivingDNA, however:

90% British and Irish

8% Europe North and West (they tried to further define as Scandinavian)

And 1.3% Asia South (India again)

On this site, there is a break down of the UK contribution by country/region and there is 3.7% in Southeast England that has a disclaimer, stating:

If you have Southeast England ancestry that you didn’t expect: If you expected Germanic ancestry, then it is likely that it has been mistaken for British ancestry. If you expected British ancestry, but not East Anglian, then it is possible that you possess a slightly higher Anglo-Saxon ancestry proportion than expected and East Anglia is used to represent this.

This site also shows Scottish ancestry, as I would expect...however, does not show French or German specifically (the Europe north and west might be representing this, but they guessed it to be Scandinavian.)

I also took my raw DNA from FTDNA and uploaded it at MyHeritage. They didn't show ANY Asian/Indian/trace regions at all. And, instead, said I was 100% European:

49.5% North&West European

29.9% English

20.6% Scandinavian


All the sites said fairly drastically different estimates within the European break down, though were 3% within being European as a whole. Point being, this is NOT an exact science. They can tell if you're EUROPEAN, or ASIAN, or AFRICAN, or NATIVE AMERICAN predominantly...however, breaking down regions within these main clusters is much more difficult to pinpoint accurately. I thought my British was over estimated with LivingDNA, under estimated with FTDNA, and then wtf?@randomly saying a whopping 20% Scandinavian at MyHeritage? I say, if you test with multiple companies, or upload your DNA and have it evaluated by multiple calculators, you're probably going to get a more accurate admixture result by averaging ALL results you have received from every where. But, that's my opinion. Until this science gets more precise, our ethnicity estimates will be just that...an estimate. Subject to interpretation.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I'm German-Asian-American yet I have ancestry from the British Isles? wtta myOrigins Basics 8 11th June 2017 02:14 PM
Eastern Europe/German Ancestry prairielad myOrigins Basics 35 23rd April 2016 01:06 AM
Forum text now all in German/Spanish Lipitzan Features Requests & Bug Reports Area 6 9th December 2014 02:05 PM
Forum is in German? DWFlineage Recreation Room 2 14th October 2014 08:15 AM
Help needed for interpreting Y-DNA results - German and Scandinavian ancestry jtoml3 Paternal Lineage (Y-DNA STR) Basics 1 10th June 2014 05:46 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 PM.


Family Tree DNA - World Headquarters

1445 North Loop West, Suite 820
Houston, Texas 77008, USA

Phone: (713) 868-1438 | Fax: (832) 201-7147
Copyright 2001-2010 Genealogy by Genetics, Ltd.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.