Results for marker CDYa and CDYb

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • morvoren
    FTDNA Customer
    • Sep 2016
    • 8

    Results for marker CDYa and CDYb

    Results for the marker CDYa and CDYb - recorded in a possible 4-way match:

    37-40
    36-40
    33-40
    33-40

    How significant are the unusual 4-step and 3-step mutations in CDYa, when the number for CDYb is the same for all 4 results?

    Does the 37 and 36 count as a 4 and 3-step mutation from 33 - or simply as a 1-step? FTDNA seems to reckon it as only 1 - whereas ysearch counts it as 4 and 3.

    Is this amount of mutation usual for this particular marker - and why might it have occurred?
  • Araminta
    FTDNA Customer
    • Sep 2016
    • 16

    #2
    Following ...

    I have same type of question on DYS464.

    A: 15-15-15-15
    B: 13-13-16-16
    C: 13-13-14-14
    What are the mutation counts when calculating GDs?

    Also is 40 -> 42 one or two mutations?
    What about: A:29, B:30, C:31

    These are all actual values in my comparison. Thank you for any enlightment on this!

    Comment

    • Darren
      FTDNA Customer
      • Jun 2007
      • 884

      #3
      Hello all,

      CDY A and B are some of the faster moving markers we test. It uses what is called the infinite allele method for counting mismatches. So whether it is a 35-40, 37-40, 39-40, these three would all be considered a genetic distance of 1 at this marker. The system will always list the lowest numeric value allele first. So you would not see one listed as 40-37 for example.

      As for DYS 464 you don't count the number of steps that the values are off, but just one for each mismatching value.

      In the first comparison:

      A: 15-15-15-15
      B: 13-13-16-16

      This would be a genetic distance of four. Since none of the markers match up.

      B: 13-13-16-16
      C: 13-13-14-14

      In this second comparison above, this would be a genetic distance of 2, as would the following example:

      13, 13 , 16, 17

      14 , 16, 17, 18

      -Darren

      Comment

      • Araminta
        FTDNA Customer
        • Sep 2016
        • 16

        #4
        Thank you Darren! So we follow the minimum variation route.

        Comment

        • morvoren
          FTDNA Customer
          • Sep 2016
          • 8

          #5
          CDYa ad CDYb mutations

          Thank you Darren. That's all very clear and helpful.

          Comment

          Working...
          X